Natural Hairstyling License VS. Cosmo License?

 

My real passion is hair extensions. I am already able and know how to install them in a few different methods. I live in Brooklyn, NY so I think the call for extensions should be pretty high. I'm willing to travel to any of the boroughs, CT, and NJ for a small fee therefore I think I'd be pretty available.

 

I'm not sure which license would benefit me more. With a natural hairstyling license I can still shampoo (if necessary.. which I'm thinking may not be too necessary with extensions?) and give a haircut with the extensions in. The only thing I couldn't do would color hair but personally, I'm not so sure that's something I really want to pursue. I guess it could be benefical but I'd much rather just be installing extensions like a crazy lady, lol.

 

I plan on offering cold fusion.. as well as link-in wefts. I thought about offering glue but I think it may be better to stay away from glue.

 

A cosmo license will take me several months longer but the school is closer to home where as the school for the natural hairstyling license if probabaly about a 30 min drive each way but it's for a shorter amount of time.

 

I really do not want to work in a salon as I find myself much happier being independent. I wouldn't mind sometimes working in a salon for extensions per say.. but I wouldn't want to work in a salon doing cuts and color.

 

What do you all think?