HALLE BERRY ON OSCAR NIGHT.

At the Lakers' game.

http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/FrameSet.aspx?s=EventImagesSearchState|1|-1|30|0|0|1|0|0|0|52265517|0|0|0|0|0||-8193|0|0|0&p=3

www.fortwayne.com/mld/newssentinel/living/10731215.htm

Here she is on March 3, publicising "Their Eyes were Watching God". I'm sure her real hair is supplemented here as it is several inches longer than at the oscars and looks much more luxuriant at the ends.

http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/FrameSet.aspx?s=ImagesSearchState%7c0%7c30%7c0%7c1%7c%7c%7c0%7c0%7c0%7c0%7c3%7challe%2bberry%7c0%7c0&p=3

No Halle isn't shaped weird. She's beautiful.

Her hair didn't look all that good though. It looked flat and she looks much more adorable in her short pixie.

Ive seen her look better than oscar night....her dress made her look weird shaped and i swear that wasnt her real hair.....but she didnt look that good at all oscar night.....

Halle's hair has basically been growing since the Oscars in March of 2003. Since then she's worn wigs, extenstions of various lengths, and, periodically, her own natural hair. The tsunami relief special was an example of Halle's current actual length. Curly, it would fall on or just below her shoulders. Straightened, it would be probably be a few inches below (based on the 12 inches or so of growth she should have had from the pixie).

I agree that the really long straight hair is at least partially fake, but there should be quite a bit of Halle's in there too. And I'm still thinking that this change to straight of late may have something to do with "Nappily Ever After", since that's a key plot point of the book/movie.

JF

Dude, tell me you have finally accepted the fact her hair isn't real.

fatmoogas wrote: Maybe the real question is whether she could have gone from the pixie in March 2003 to this, just 8 months later (November 2003). If this was real growth, then there is no problem believing the rate of subsequent growth. Another photo, in case the above link doesn't work. http://femalefirst.co.uk/images/halle-berry.jpg

Without the curls, her hair looks more like extensions than ever. It was six inches shorter a week or so ago on some show. Oprah maybe?

fatmoogas wrote: Think she could make a better job of it if they were extensions--looks a bit tired and thin towards the ends. Rate of hair growth is not an exact science.

You are right, growth rate is not an exact science, but it does average 6 to 7 inches a year. 2 years = 12 to 14 inches. Halle's hair was much longer than that. Possible? Yes. Probable? No, definately not.

Extensions are out? Not here.

What have you been smoking? Those are definately extensions. Go to http://www.wireimage.com and search for Halle Berry. You will see that two years ago her hair was her "trademark" short, short cut (1 to 3 inches long, at most). There is no way that her hair could grow the 18 to 20 inches in two years that you claim.

fatmoogas wrote: I thought Halle Berry was looking great. Looks like the extensions are out and all that hair is really hers. http://www.oscar.com/oscarnight/redcarpet/34543.html http://www.oscar.com/oscarnight/redcarpet/34544.html http://www.oscar.com/oscarnight/redcarpet/34545.html