QuoteReplyTopic: Dana Delaney Posted: May 20 2006 at 12:54pm
Stu, my request was for you and Kramer to be civil to each other. Clarification, if my prior post was not clear: Inciting others by personal criticism/attack is not tolerated. Inciting others to (potentially) emotional reactions for on-topic comments, however, is acceptable.
I will ask you to refrain from personal attacks against anyone here, including me. If you have a problem with me, I encourage you to PM Karen with your complaint, or, at least, take it offline with me. I will admit my curiosity as to the extremity of your dislike of me.
Stu
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Newbie
Joined: February 24 2002
Status: Offline
Points: 37
I first remember seeing Dana Delaney in an episode of Moonlighting (OK, I'm dating myself) playing an ex of Bruce Willis. She had a very short, almost buzzed back bob which looked amazing. Her hair has always looked good!
As for the stroll down memory lane, I don't mind them at all!
Kuroneko
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Elite Member
Joined: August 27 2003
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 2023
I don't know what the point of Kramer's query ("Is it possible there was a previous thread on her that is no longer found using Search?") was. Unless it was to give himself an opportunity to find and share (7 minutes later) the reference he sought. It doesn't matter if the subject was discussed 3 years ago; the point of the new thread seemed to be to mention how she looks now. No reason that links to old photos could not have been provided... but pointing out the old thread seems pointless. As was Stu's mocking of Kramer.
Please refrain from intentionally inciting others.
Just following your lead Dave. You seem very good at inciting others.
DaveDecker
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Senior Moderator
Joined: November 28 2000
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3247
I don't know what the point of Kramer's query ("Is it possible there was a previous thread on her that is no longer found using Search?") was. Unless it was to give himself an opportunity to find and share (7 minutes later) the reference he sought. It doesn't matter if the subject was discussed 3 years ago; the point of the new thread seemed to be to mention how she looks now. No reason that links to old photos could not have been provided... but pointing out the old thread seems pointless. As was Stu's mocking of Kramer.
Please refrain from intentionally inciting others.
Kramer
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Lifetime Member
Joined: March 21 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 5000
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum