Rebecca Gayheart

Kramer wrote: Is there anyone that does not want this woman?   More photos. Somehow (!) her hair is even longer. Outstanding.   http://img230.imagevenue.com/view.php?image=30551_by_Septimiu_8_Celebrity69_Blog_Rebecca_Gayheart-Heaven_Celebrating_10_Years_event-04_122_465lo.jpg   The rest from this set:   http://forums.superiorpics.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/1056101587/an/0/page/0#1056101587

Yes, Kramer. Me. I do not want this woman. I don't see how taking someone with naturally gorgeous, full, bouncy, shiny curls, and straightening the hair to within an inch of its life, then adding the "looking-from-inside-a-teepee" severe center part, without any layering or bangs or anything to break it up, then throwing in too much eye makeup for good measure, makes her better looking or more "want-able" in any way than her natural curls would (or more stylish, given how this trend mercifully exited the scene some five years ago now).

Not trying to be antagonistic, here, Kramer, but your posts often have an element of absolutism to them, the presumption that anyone with long hair is by definition gorgeous. and how could anyone not like it? So I just like to remind you that yes, I (and others, I suspect) might have a different opinion. It doesn't have to be curly for me to like it, but it does have to compliment the wearer, and this, well, it just don't. IMHO.

That is all...

Wow what a set that was thank you Kramer. Agree outstanding.

Her curls are natural. I remember reading an interview on her a few years back where she said they were. I think she just straightens it every now and then to mix it up.

"More of the same!" the people exclaim.

Kramer thank you for that link. Wow she looks great.

I just had to share. This made my day:

I am inclined to believe that her curls are natural.

BTW Kramer, can you post the actual photo url?  I'm not inclined to join getty images