QuoteReplyTopic: Katherine Heigl Posted: July 14 2014 at 12:07pm
Searched for old post, to no avail, again. Anyway, she's back promoting a new tv show, after her "break". She's sporting a lot more hair than when we last saw her, and all in all, I think she looks great.From this months Marie Claire,
rardman
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Member
Joined: January 23 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 771
Wow figure she would have stay short. Thanks for the update. I do like her with longer hair.
Few men are killed by the bayonet;many are scared by it.Bayonets should be fixed when the fire fight starts.General George Patton Jr.,War As I Knew It,1947.
loveshorthair
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Super Elite Member
Joined: August 09 2001
Status: Offline
Points: 3965
Personally, I don't care and never do. Some people, and I'm not saying you, are like "the extension police". I don't know why people ever care.
It's Hollywood to start with. Boobs are fake, tummies are lipoed, tans are sprayed, corrective make-up is an art form, and let's not even start with photoshop. So, if someone wants to augment length, volume, texture or color by adding some hair, I say go for it (as long as they are done well)! Wigs, falls and pieces have been used in the industry for years. I've been doing hair for over twenty years, and use them all the time. Great tool!
Anyway, in answer to your question, I would say her hair is collar bone length now, with long layers. Everything else is extensions, imo! You'll notice even when I posted the initial pic, I said "she was sporting" more hair. I didn't for a second think she'd grown all that, lol.
Anyway, have a great one!
Edited by rardman - July 15 2014 at 8:30pm
fatmoogas
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Lifetime Member
Super Member
Joined: March 15 2005
Location: UAE
Status: Offline
Points: 5654
I'm pretty sure she's bothering with them on this month's cover, lol
Also in the top pic there is very obvious length added in the back. Otherwise the cut makes zero sense. No stylist would leave such obvious disconnect between side and back perimeter.
Edited by rardman - July 16 2014 at 9:16am
fatmoogas
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Lifetime Member
Super Member
Joined: March 15 2005
Location: UAE
Status: Offline
Points: 5654
I'm pretty sure she's bothering with them on this month's cover, lol
Also in the top pic there is very obvious length added in the back. Otherwise the cut makes zero sense. No stylist would leave such obvious disconnect between side and back perimeter.
Doesn't make much sense with extensions either.
jug jug to dirty ears
HAWG
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Lifetime Member
Joined: April 30 2001
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 6321
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum