Alyssa Milano

Ouch..people age, and aside from a few missteps she's doing nicely...i think

JerkyFlea wrote: So, here's my unsolicited theory and prediction... As you're probably aware, during pregnancy, women's natural hair loss slows dramatically. Shortly after childbirth, nature plays catch-up and the shedding increases at an equally dramatic rate. All the hair that was supposed to fall out and didn't, now does. When Alyssa started making public appearances again after her baby was born, we all commented that her hair, when worn down, looked "off". It had that cotton-candy look of fine hair that had been fluffed up to add volume. And Alyssa does not have fine hair. So, my theory is that she finally punted and decided to cut it short because she just couldn't get it to look decent with out WAY too much effort or simply wearing it up. That's also why I think she went short, but not REALLY short. The way this style is cut (full on top, still covering the ears), it will be much easier to grow out than a full-blown pixie. That's not to say she won't go shorter; most women do when they go short after having long hair for an extended period. But they also then tend to grow it back out. Thus, on to my prediction... My guess over the next few months, you'll see Alyssa stay around this length or possibly go even shorter. However, by mid-year at the earliest and end of year at the latest, you'll see her start to grow it out again. That will be about the time the regrowth of hair will have balanced out the hair loss. I do, unfortunately, think the days of Alyssa rocking a mane around mid-back or so are past. For this cut to grow back out below her shoulders will be about a two year process. I definitely think she will be back below shoulder length, though. So, Kramer can look forward to 2018 for Alyssa to have fully returned to her long locks.

And, now that I've arrogantly quoted myself from back in January, I give you Alyssa in late August:

http://www.wireimage.com/search/#events?q=alyssa%20milano/[662485575]&ep=1/60/1&s=3

IMHO, this tentatively signifies the beginnings of the grow-out. Why? Because, if you look closely, you can see that her highlights have been recently done (no significant roots), but the length is longer than it was back in June. Plus, it's definitely longer than when she first got it cut and even longer than appearances back in April.

So, that growth, plus recent color without a cut, seems to me to put her on the path to a future longer 'do. And to make Kramer happy.

As usual,
JF

that would be a damn shame if that were the case

Definitely rather sad as she has been such an icon.

I agree on the grow out, but disagree on the style...she looks great, long, short extreme, colored, natural, however she wears her hair....

http://celebritybabies.people.com/2016/09/16/alyssa-milano-love-csection-scar/

JerkyFlea wrote: Though not the most flattering style, I believe this confirms my "grow-out" theory... http://www.wireimage.com/search/#events?q=alyssa%20milano/[666314555]&ep=1/60/1&s=3 The back has been trimmed shorter to better match up with the sides and the top is definitely getting longer. On this path, she should have a legitimate chin-length bob around Christmas. JF

So, Alyssa got short extensions to lengthen her approaching chin-length bob to her shoulders. Someone can go get the links/pics from Instagram because I can't do it right now. In any case, I think my "grow-out" conjecture has moved from theory to fact.

Oh, and it looks really cute.

JF

Looks good but kind of an odd length for extensions. Usually  extensions = long. 

Not so good.

That's just wrong...