i suspect she had extensions and/or hair pieces added to her existing hair to make it that full and thick. I dont know if you've seen her on the cover of any magazines (she's on a few lately), but her natural hair length and volume dont look like they did in Austin Powers. I really do like the style she wears in that movie. If it was all styling that got her that look, it must have taken hours and lots of hair spray!
According to the June issue of Allure magazine, during the movie she was put on a rotation between Frederic Fekkai Technician shampoo and conditioner; Redken Climatress conditioner; and Kheil's extra-strength conditioning rinse. She also used Frederic Fekkai Apple cider clearing rinse. Her stylist then used Goldwell Vivante Leave-in conditioner and Philosophy Let's Get Something Straight before styling it with a blow-dryer and large-barrel curling iron. She also attached a hairpiece and then finished the look with Khiel's Creme With Silk Groom.
I'd never heard of hairpieces for women before reading this but apparently in the '60s it was a very big trend. I wonder if this will come back as a way to make hair thicker or if it just looks silly in real life and that's why it went out of style.
> Check out this month's Cosmo. They tell you exactly > how to copy her style.
> I've read elsewhere that she wore TONS of leave-in > conditioner between stylings, and that she wore a hair > piece in most scenes.
> Ally
Don't you think it was a little misleading for Cosmo not to mention her hairpieces? There are probably hundreds of women wondering why Cosmo's technique didn't yield the same results. IMHO They should have said you could come close to that look but also not perpuate the already overinflated image of stars that creates ideals real women can't live up to.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum