Banishing Bad Hair Days since 1997!™
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - how strict was it when you were
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

how strict was it when you were "our age"?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
duke View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: December 11 2000
Status: Offline
Points: 603
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote duke Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: how strict was it when you were "our age"?
    Posted: September 10 2003 at 10:00am
Hi, there, senior friends.

I am almost 24, so I am not nearly old enough
to be a senior citizen...or to remember what
it was like in much of the 20th century. As
those of you who visit the other hair talk
boards may know, I have posted on many
discussions which discuss whether or not a
certain way of wearing your hair is "acceptable"
or not - paticularly discussions about men
having long hair. I know that during much of
the 20th century - the years when you seniors
were growing up and young, when people
were MUCH stricter about how you could and
couldn't look. So I was wondering if some of
you could share memories, so that I may get
a picture of what it was like. In particular, can
you answer some of the following about the
period from the 1920s to the 1950s:

-why was it such a no-no for men to have long
hair? I wouldn't call Elvis and the Beatles'
hair long, not really, but back then, it was
considered so and many people would have
preferred to see them all in crewcuts!!! Was
a man with long hair (if that even existed -
practically the only one I can think of from that
time was Albert Einstein, who was eccentric
(and aren't professors sometimes tolerated in
this respect ?). A man seems by
definition to have HAD to have short hair. What
do you think people would have said back then
if a professional man grew his hair a bit - called
him gay? A slob? Effeminate?

-What did barbers use before electric clippers to
taper hair? Did they ever just do it with scissors?

-Women, at least urban women seem to have normally styled their hair a lot, and to have rarely worn it really long (except maybe in Europe?) after the mass-bobbing of the 1920s (it got longer
in the '30s but not always that much). Was this
just fashion, or was it a matter of being socially
acceptable like with men having to have short
hair. To explain the point better, if a woman from
the 1930s to the 1950s wore her hair truly long,
and unstyled (or at least not curled/permed but
in a bun or something), would it just be
unfashionable, or would people say she was
dirty/unkempt, ostracize her etc? I think there
were more such women (eg. Virginia Woolf, I
think,) than men with longish/long hair.

-Was shaving one's head socially acceptable?

-Finally, what precisely was the status of having
a full beard? In pictures from World War I to
the 1960s, men almost always shave, except
for some old men, other than the odd
mustache or sideburns. Was this again fashion
or a real social issue? Could a businessman in
the 1930s or 40s have a beard or would it be
considered dirty, strange etc? I know it was
associated with communism, because of
bearded Russians - (duhh!)

What do y'all remember? I'm curious.
Back to Top
Paula View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: August 09 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Paula Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 20 2004 at 7:52pm
I'm 26 so I probably don't quite qualify for the senior status quite yet, but I can answer one question. Before electric clippers, there were hand-held clippers. Have you ever seen hand-held trimmers for a lawn? Same principle. The hand squeezes together the blades.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down


Copyright 1997-2018, hairboutique.com, All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service, Privacy Statement, Advertise, Contact Us, Press, Disclaimer