QuoteReplyTopic: Hair from top of head vs. back of head? Posted: May 17 2006 at 4:50pm
Em... I think he's saying that one's hair is blunt-cut at a given length on the body (such as, for example, chin-length, shoulder-length, waist-length, etc), the strands at the top of the head are longer than those lower on the head.
And FWIW, the "GM" method of measuring hair's length is even more distorting, since the number it gives is at least 6 inches longer than the longest strand could possibly be. Hypothetically speaking, one's hair length could measure at 35" using the GM method, but the longest strands can only be about 29", and the longest strands might be considerably shorter (even as short as about 23"). Not likely, but possible.
letmecount123
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Junior Member
Joined: November 24 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 104
You know... I find all of your posts incredibly hard to read, dude20. Is it really so difficult to spell out "u" ... and I don't understand the question anyway.
SpecialKitty
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Member
Joined: November 19 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 550
IF u started all over by shaving your hair or cutting it really short...Well, the hair in the back of your head is at the 6 or 7 inch mark(if it were from the top, it would be at that mark), so if u grew it out, the hair at the back of your head would be down your back after 2 years(for example)at the 18 inch mark, even though it only measures 12 inches. So in effect, it only takes 3 years not 4 to get hair to almost waist length(like halfway down the back).
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Topic Options
Post Options
Thanks(0)
