Banishing Bad Hair Days since 1997!™
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Euthanasia
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedEuthanasia

 Post Reply Post Reply
Poll Question: An individual should be allowed "the right to die" in terminal illness
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
3 [60.00%]
0 [0.00%]
2 [40.00%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Anomis View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: March 22 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 733
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Euthanasia
    Posted: July 07 2007 at 4:11pm

Euthanasia, The Good Death

"Euthanasia" comes from two Greek words meaning "good death."  In practice, it has come to mean the selective killing of those who are old or sick.  Worldwide, support for the practice appears to be increasing.  Vigorous efforts for legalization are proceeding in numerous countries.  The Dutch have now legalized 'mercy killing' after many years of unofficial toleration.  In our own country, euthanasia has been legalized in Oregon since 1998.  Reasons given for support include honoring the civil rights of an individual to choose death over an unacceptable quality of life and a need for providing a means for death with dignity, often with the motive of not burdening loved ones.  Supporters cite a report from the Oregon Health Division for the year 2000, which states that 65% of those committing suicide mention fear of being a 'burden on family, friends or caregivers' as a reason for their decision.[i]

The tragedy is that the above concerns of the sick and elderly arise from pressures exerted by a materialistic, self-centered society which increasingly embraces the notion of "throw away" human beings.  There are people who would allow physicians to kill their parents and grandparents once they cease to function as providers of life's necessities and opportunities.  After many years of service, mom and dad, granny and grandpa are treated like dogs, they are sent to the hospital to be injected with a lethal overdose of drugs.  Supporters of euthanasia lie to themselves and others by saying that they want to end suffering.  Their true motives are to get rid of those who become a problem.  For example, now that grandpa and grandma are out of the way, there is more time and money to enjoy life.

Euthanasia is one step closer to the utopian society many dream of.  One of those dreamers who used euthanasia was the infamous Chancellor of Germany.  His name was Adolf Hitler.  In 1939, he made the following statement when ordering the widespread 'mercy killing' for 'life unworthy of life.' "The authority of certain physicians to be designated by name in such manner that persons who, according to human judgment, are incurable can, upon a most careful diagnosis of their condition of sickness, be accorded a mercy death."[ii]  With euthanasia, Hitler came closer to that perfect Aryan race he dreamed of--or it was his delusion that he did.  With euthanasia, he could kill off the unwanted elderly, handicapped, and other people that he decided were unfit to live in his utopian society.  If you support euthanasia, then you and Hitler have something in common.

This issue is not about the right to commit suicide.  It is about placing the lives of the weakest among us in the hands of people other than themselves who often have self-serving agendas.  Once society gives a group of people the right to end life, our right to life disappears behind red tape.  The value of life diminishes when it can be taken away by others.  The National Conference of Catholic Bishops made the following statement, "The Declaration of Independence proclaims our inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  If our right to life itself is diminished in value, our other rights will have no meaning."[iii]

Supporters of euthanasia think that with strict guidelines, doctors involved will do no wrong.  I disagree.  With euthanasia, the medical profession will lose the ethical bonds that hold its credibility and morality together.  For example, in the Hippocratic Oath, the following ethic will be deemed 'useless' if euthanasia becomes widespread in America: "I will neither prescribe nor administer a lethal dose of medicine to any patient. . . "[iv]  Once the medical profession loses its ethics, what is going to stop them from administering overdoses to the 'unwanted' without their consent?  Nothing will! Look at the example from the Dutch.  The American Supreme Court, in their 1997 ruling, Washington v.  Glucksberg, cited a 1991 Dutch government study.  It states that in 1990, nearly 6,000 of the 130,000 people who died in the Netherlands were involuntarily euthanized.  With 4% of the deaths being unnatural and involuntary, euthanasia is not only a danger to society but a danger to you when you yourself are weak.[v]

By legalizing euthanasia, morals that have been practiced for thousands of years are ignored.  Death should be natural.  It should not be hastened by a physician.  When a society murders the elderly for convenience, who is next on the list? We will begin to kill off other 'unwanted' people.  The Nazis did that; they euthanized millions in their attempt to create their utopian race.  In a utopia, the unwanted are slaughtered for the convenience and to 'benefit' the wanted.  Destroying life for the selfish reasons of saving time and money damages our society.  Would it not be better to love and care for the elderly?

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down