Banishing Bad Hair Days since 1997!™
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Hair rules at work
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Hair rules at work

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
dianefromcanada View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: December 15 2000
Status: Offline
Points: 559
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dianefromcanada Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Hair rules at work
    Posted: May 12 2000 at 5:38pm
Hello Bobbedguy:

When you enter that type of instituition you pay a lot of money for any of those programs. You are fully prepared. In that institution they transform the candidates into an idea person for the business market.
There is a range of ages. You can have a person that just graduated from highschool and has no idea what the business sector is like and you can have people who want to change their career and will be successful in finding a new career by going to that intitution.
In the classes it is very much employer-employee conduct so everyone has to dress up as they are going to work in that specialized field. In the area where I live it is very conservative so it makes sense that the institution would strongly encourage all candidates to dress to fit right in.
Yes Bobbedguy the hair issue was brought up. They are very serious about having all their candidates succeed in their career choice and going there is very expensive and their success rate of placing their students in the specilized fields is very high and their reputation is very good. People are proud that they went to that intituition so they must know what they are doing or advising for this territory. The only point that I am making is that they have researched this territory and they are working with it.
dianefromcanada
Back to Top
bobbedguy View Drop Down
Junior Member
Junior Member


Joined: December 06 2000
Status: Offline
Points: 52
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bobbedguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 12 2000 at 11:46am
diane,
Did they specifically single out hair or was it brought up in another fashion? I really think that these people are going too far with these restrictions. Although I don't necessarily agree with businesses dictating a persons hair length/style I can see some bases for that, but taking a course is another thing. Why should they care what your hair looks like? You are paying for the class.
Back to Top
dianefromcanada View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: December 15 2000
Status: Offline
Points: 559
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dianefromcanada Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 11 2000 at 9:37pm
I am starting a course at an elite secondary school. We were told to dress business like and we were told that noone will be seen around the school with spike hair or any wild colors as the business sector will not hire such candidates. I joke and said " oh well I will have to cancel my appointment next week" and of course everyone thought it was funny. Of course the instructor knew I was joking as I have long hair.

Diane from Canada
dianefromcanada
Back to Top
bobbedguy View Drop Down
Junior Member
Junior Member


Joined: December 06 2000
Status: Offline
Points: 52
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bobbedguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 27 2000 at 10:16am
Respect and admiration must be urned no matter what length or style your hair is. I assure you that in the corporate world there are many women with crewcut type styles and they are not humiliated or unrespected. Hair should be a display of personality and should not determine whether you get a job or not. Prejudging someone on their hair length or style makes you overlook the person themselves. Some of the great geniouses had what is considered long hair and some of the laziest people on the planet probably have short hair.
If a guy with long hair showed up for a job interview and you looked at his long hair and automatically drew your conclusion that he wasn't presentable and would probably not be a good employee then you stand a great chance of turning away a person that may well be your best employee simply because of hair. To me that is pretty shallow and dumb.
Back to Top
Ally View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2002
Status: Offline
Points: 55
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ally Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 26 2000 at 7:38am
Well, their reasoning is that it's culturally unacceptable and startling for a woman to wear a buzz cut. She would be the object of humiliation instead of respect.

That same rationale applies to jewelry. Women can wear one earring of an approved type in each each ear. Men may wear none.

Ally
Back to Top
bobbedguy View Drop Down
Junior Member
Junior Member


Joined: December 06 2000
Status: Offline
Points: 52
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bobbedguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2000 at 1:35pm
Why does a skirt and jacket automatically mean pantyhose? I like bare legs. You always have the choice not to wear pantyhose and if anyone asks say that they make you break out or something.
I think that companies are going too far when they dictate a persons freedom to express themselves through appearance. That said there are some people who go way to far but you always have the people who overdo it. I'm talking about everyday people here.
Oh and yes I have tried makeup and yes I like it too. I like a great deal of things that are traditionally considered feminine. I envy women because they have all the choices in the world open to them pertaining to hair, clothing, and things like makeup and accessories where guys have very very few.
Back to Top
bobbedguy View Drop Down
Junior Member
Junior Member


Joined: December 06 2000
Status: Offline
Points: 52
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bobbedguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2000 at 1:25pm
You see that is a perfect example of the "Hair double standard" and the freedom that women enjoy over men when it comes to appearance. The girls can grow their hair as long as they want but the guys have to stay with crew cuts. Why?
Back to Top
Ally View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2002
Status: Offline
Points: 55
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ally Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2000 at 10:30am
Um....hrm. Well, I'm glad you like them. But many women find them uncomfortable and expensive, since they run so easily and must be replaced.

And no, I don't choose to wear them. At some business functions, a skirted suit with a jacket is required. And that means pantyhose.

Some companies even /require/ female executives to wear makeup. Let me guess. You've worn makeup and like it. What's my problem?

Ally

Ally
Back to Top
Ally View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2002
Status: Offline
Points: 55
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ally Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2000 at 10:26am
I did a year at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy before deciding that the military was not for me. The male swabs (first-year cadets) have their heads shaved almost to their scalp. The female swabs are forced to wear ear-length bobs.

After Swab Summer, the men can grow their hair /slightly/ longer. The women can grow theirs as long as they wish, but it must be worn "off the collar" using a maximum of three barrettes. No unnatural colors or "faddish" styles are allowed. And no facial hair.

Ally
Back to Top
bobbedguy View Drop Down
Junior Member
Junior Member


Joined: December 06 2000
Status: Offline
Points: 52
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bobbedguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2000 at 10:03am
I hope that society starts viewing long hair on men as acceptable a lot sooner than 80 years from now. When this does happen I will let my just below ear length bobbed hair grow to just above my shoulders.
Back to Top
bobbedguy View Drop Down
Junior Member
Junior Member


Joined: December 06 2000
Status: Offline
Points: 52
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bobbedguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2000 at 10:00am
I see nothing wrong with pantyhose. I have worn them and I actually like them. Besides you CHOOSE to wear them. No one is forcing you to.
Back to Top
DaveDecker View Drop Down
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
Avatar

Joined: November 28 2000
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3247
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DaveDecker Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2000 at 9:17pm
Hi Ally,

I fully understand that U.S. companies are allowed to define their target market in whatever way they see fit, even if they don't "see" very clearly. :-)

It's interesting that the U.S. Supreme Court would uphold a company's right to require a long-haired male employee (note: already employed) to cut his hair short against his will or else be fired, and justify the claim that this does not constitute harassment. By the opposite token, women (in general, people specifically) are protected by this same court from being required to perform certain other non-consensual acts, so it puzzles me why the courts don't seem to apply a consistent standard for enforcing non-consensual, physical and psychologically effecting acts.
Back to Top
dianefromcanada View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: December 15 2000
Status: Offline
Points: 559
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dianefromcanada Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2000 at 4:04pm
it even starts as soon as the air cadets. My son came home with a diagram on exactly how they want the cadets to keep their hair and he is only 13.
dianefromcanada
Back to Top
JennyAG View Drop Down
Unregistered
Unregistered
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JennyAG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2000 at 1:22pm
I have just remembered something that I read a couple
of years ago that might be relevent to this debate. I
read somewhere about a woman shop assistant in the
1920s who was sacked because she 'bobbed' her hair.
This sounds similar to what we are talking about.
Before the 1920s every woman had long hair. A
woman with short hair was almost unheard of. Women
cutting their hair short in the 20s (bobbing it) was
viewed in the same way that some view men growing
their hair today. This woman was sacked because she
cut her long hair short yet today nobody batts an eyelid
at seeing a woman with short hair. I would assume
that if , in these two cases, if the men had not cut their
hair short, one would have been sacked and the other
wouldn't have got the job. I think the situation that these
men found themselves in today is exactly the same as
the situation that the woman I read about found herself
in in the 20s. I wonder if, in 80 years time, long hair on
men will be viewed in the same way as short hair on
women is today with nobody thinking it strange or out of
place.
Back to Top
Ally View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2002
Status: Offline
Points: 55
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ally Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2000 at 10:54am
You want to talk about unfair and ridiculous double standards? Let's talk about pantyhose, baby.....
Back to Top
Ally View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2002
Status: Offline
Points: 55
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ally Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2000 at 10:51am
Dave~

I'm not saying the employer is /correct/ in identifying its target market this way. I'm saying it has the /right/ to do so.

The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld an employer's right to dictate hair lengths and dress codes--even if there is a disparity between the rules for each gender. As long as this disparity does not constitute harassment (as in mandating that all women will wear 17-inch skirts with heels), it is allowable. The military is a perfect example.

Ally
Back to Top
bobbedguy View Drop Down
Junior Member
Junior Member


Joined: December 06 2000
Status: Offline
Points: 52
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bobbedguy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2000 at 8:38am
Reading through these posts it seems to me that maybe women are just angry and fearful when a guy with long hair walks in the door. They look at him an almost automatically think that he is invading the female territory when it comes to hair and they think that he should cut it. I say this because it seems that in the two cases mentioned, both bosses that forced the haircut were women. Well hair is a from of self expression and as long as it is neat why can't a guy have long hair? No one ever addressed my issue about a short short haired woman applying for a job. Do you think that the boss would force her to grow her hair longer or be kicked out the door? I seriously doubt it. And what about mid length hair on guys? Is that more acceptable? I am a guy and have my bobbed just below my ears with bangs. I love the style and I think that it looks great on me. I also work in a proffessional environment and nobody has said anything about a haircut. And yes I interact with customers almost everyday. I think that there is a HUGE double standard in the corporate world that needs to be addressed. Women with very short pixie cuts and crew cuts aren't forced to grow their hair out for a job to fit the "female image" better so why should a guy be forced to get a short cut to fit the "male image"?????
Back to Top
wolfgang View Drop Down
Junior Member
Junior Member


Joined: January 04 2001
Status: Offline
Points: 97
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote wolfgang Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 23 2000 at 2:08pm
I think it is different if one thinks someone others has to look in a special way or if someone has the power to force it. A manager in a bank should be able to get more distance to his own sight of view. As you said the haircut of the man with long hair has only depend from her subjectiv opinion. I wonder that a woman with long hair, if she likes it, is not able to see that similar feelings can occur by a man respective his hair. I wouldn't like it to work with such a boss, I would be angry about her ignorant behaviour.
Back to Top
mandyJ View Drop Down
Unregistered
Unregistered
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mandyJ Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2000 at 11:37am
I work as a cashier in a bank. We ware a corperate
uniform and have to be very smart. However, I can ware
my hair (which is very long) anyway I please (up, down,
braid etc) so long as it is well groomed. It is interesting
what you said about this man having to have his hair
cut. Not so long ago a man with quite long hair came to
work at the bank. He was told, by the then manager of
the bank, that he could keep it so long as he tied it back
in a pony tail and kept it well groomed. However, there
was a change of manager and the new one (a woman)
made him cut his hair. This, I think, is double
standards. On your point about these things being
taught to us when we are very young, I agree. Nobody
thinks twice about my having long hair, and people
have said how smart I look in the uniform even when it
is loose. However, I must say, when this man had long
hair I didn't like it and always had a secret desire to
creep up on him with a pair of scissors and cut it off!
And I think he looks better with short hair. I think the
problem is, people think I look smart with my long hair
because women are 'supposed' to have long hair and
so nobody really notices it. However, men are 'not
supposed' to have long hair and so, when one does,
people notice it and say how awful it looks. For a man
to look smart he traditionally has to have short hair,
long hair doesn't work. For a woman to look smart she
can have long hair so long as it is well groomed. This
is not what I think but what society, rightly or wrongly,
insists on.
Back to Top
JennyAG View Drop Down
Unregistered
Unregistered
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JennyAG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2000 at 8:34am
I totally agree that a person's appearance has nothing
to do with whether they are professional or can do the
job etc. It is interesting that it is perfectly acceptable for
a woman with, say, waist length hair to work in a bank
but it is not acceptable for a man with the same length
hair. I am sure this has got to do with society's
imprinting on us at an early age as to what is right and
what is wrong. In the same way, I, personally do not
like seeing long hair on men (this does not mean to
say that I think they shouldn't have it!). Before his hair
cut, I thought this man looked awful. Yet I do not think
that women with long hair look awful (well, not all the
time!). I am sure that this has to with when I was a
child and I learned (by my interaction with people
around me) that it was not acceptable for men to have
long hair but it was for women. Therefore, I don't like
seeing men with long hair as, subconsciously, I was
brought up to believe that they souldn't have it
(although, consciously I don't believe this). Likewise, I
think most women look alright with long hair (including
myself!) as I was brought up to believe that woamen
are supposed to have long hair.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down