QuoteReplyTopic: How long is long? Posted: April 29 2003 at 5:18pm
When you think of hair, how long is "long" to you?
Many media sources consider "long" to be just below shoulder length. Sure, that length is long when compared to a pixie. But can just below shoulder length really be considered long when hair can grow as long as knee-length or longer?
I don't really start to think hair is long until it is about mid-back, and when it's to the waist, that's when hair is truly long (in my eyes) -- at least, for women. For men, it's a much shorter length. Even something near shoulder length on a man seems long to me.
I think something shoulder-length as "medium" length.. it's not really long, but not really short. Long hair, to me, is a couple of inches past shoulder length and longer.
hrmm.. I haven't thought of differences in length for men and women, though. But I would think something that is shoulder length as long for men.
Dave: So many men and women wear their hair at or above the shoulders today that past the shoulders probably is considered long. A man or woman with hair as long as your Dave is usually considered "super" long or "ultra' long.
I think anything around 20 inches can be considered long...which can be around mid-back/BSL. I wrote it in inches because BSL on one person could be different on another. Some people reach waist length at 32", for me it's about 28"
Dave: So many men and women wear their hair at or above the shoulders today that past the shoulders probably is considered long. A man or woman with hair as long as your Dave is usually considered "super" long or "ultra' long.
This demonstrates the basic difference that perception makes.
From my somewhat unique perspective, I can differentiate between short, medium and long based on hair's growth potential.
From the perspective of what John and Jane Q. Public, when they see hair that is longer than most other people have, that is what they think of as "long," (just past shoulder length), even though it's vastly different than my perspective.
"Long" and "short" are relative terms anyway, but it's interesting to note the large discrepancy, based on one's valid perspective, that can be ascribed to the vague description that is "long."
uzma
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Senior Member
Joined: August 27 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1057
I consider hair that is past the hips to be truly long. From the waist to the hips is medium-long From the shoulders to the waist is medium Above this, hair is degrees of shortness.
Hair below the knees is in a league of it's own - ultra-long.
I measure 2.01, and my head itself measures a good 25-30cm. If it reaches my tailbone, I'd have strands varying from 80 to 105 cm. (32-42 inches)
For some people, that's mid thigh or sometimes knee. The knee for me, assuming longest strands from the top would be 135-140 cm. (I have a long pair of femur bones)
So yeah, it changes.
I hate all of the following and lots more : Fundamentalists, racists, sexists, fascists, ageists (people saying seniors = senile , kids = stupid , 18 = immature or a combo of them), and bigots for causes yet to receive their own designation.
Lady Godiva
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Newbie
Joined: December 02 2000
Status: Offline
Points: 42
My opinion is that hair finally becomes long when it takes time to detangle, and you have to do this several times a day, or else it threatens to become a real problem. On me, this would be about mid-back to waist length, but then I'm tall and have a long torso. I didn't start measuring my hair until a GM stylist did it for me when it was 54 inches long! I'd never thought of measuring my hair before then, and still today I don't measure often, maybe 2-3 times per year.
Jennifer Eve
Avatar: Lady Godiva by John Collier, 1898
1a F iii hair type
74" to the floor
DaveDecker
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Senior Moderator
Joined: November 28 2000
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3247
I wonder if this perception changes with the height of the person.
Of course, a taller person with waist-length hair is going to have more hair than a shorter person with waist-length hair.
But does the perception of "long" change when you're looking at people of different heights?
Interesting question, papillon_purple. Even though I objectively know that waist-length hair on a tall person is longer than the waist-length hair of a shorter person, I still think of them both as having the same relative length.
I wanted to add to the thoughts I've expressed here in that even if somebody's hair is shorter than mid-back length, that if shorter hair is growing longer, it seems "long," longer than it actually is. Maybe that's the optimist in me?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum