To Karen: Jane Seymour article
Printed From: HairBoutique.com
Category: The HairTalk® Archives
Forum Name: Hair Talk Archive
Forum Description: All the old Hair Talk Messages...
URL: https://talk.hairboutique.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=14092
Printed Date: October 02 2025 at 7:20am
Topic: To Karen: Jane Seymour article
Posted By: Clare
Subject: To Karen: Jane Seymour article
Date Posted: January 12 2000 at 2:52am
Hi, Karen,I enjoyed your article about Jane Seymour. It sounds like that was a very cool experience for you. Also, unexpected and spontaneous as well, which I bet adds to the experience. I've had read that Jane is 5'4" tall. Did that seem accurate to you? I am sure she must have cut inches off her hair, because I watched Dr. Quinn often, and it definitely was waist-lenght then. Did her hair seem fine?Thanks for the article.Regards,Clare
-------------
Clare
|
Replies:
Posted By: Ally
Date Posted: January 12 2000 at 2:53am
Hi, Karen!It /was/ a great article. I've been looking forward to it ever since I read your teaser.They say that, in general, celebrities are shorter and thinner than they appear on screen. (I saw Leonardo DiCaprio in L.A., and he was soooooooo skinny!) I guess it's true that the camera adds pounds.Ally
-------------
|
Posted By: KAREN
Date Posted: January 12 2000 at 2:53am
Hi Clare,Jane seemed much shorter than 5'4" and she also seemed to be very thin. I was just reading about all the Hollywood stars like Jennifer Aniston and Calista who are all so thin. Jane could definitely fit in. Very petite.Yes...her hair looked on the fine side. Definitely not thick and heavy like it looks in some of the photos. I suspect that she may have even done her hair herself. It didn't look bad..just not like it did on Dr. Quinn or photos I have seen. I will tell you that it looked very blonde to me and even in the photo of her accepting her award..it looks darker and redder. I can't figure that out unless it is something to do with the lighting.Thanks for the feedback. I am glad you enjoyed it. :-)Karen> Hi, Karen,> I enjoyed your article about Jane Seymour. It sounds> like that was a very cool experience for you. Also,> unexpected and spontaneous as well, which I bet adds> to the experience. I've had read that Jane is> 5'4" tall. Did that seem accurate to you? I am> sure she must have cut inches off her hair, because I> watched Dr. Quinn often, and it definitely was> waist-lenght then. Did her hair seem fine?> Thanks for the article.> Regards,> Clare
-------------
TAKE CARE WITH YOUR HAIR!
|
Posted By: KAREN
Date Posted: January 12 2000 at 2:53am
Hi Ally,I am surprised about Leonardo. He looks normal size in Titanic. Jane was very thin. Very tiny. It was a bit of a shock. No wonder the Hollywood actresses all starve. How terrible for them. :-)Thanks for the feedback. I am glad you enjoyed it.Now I just have to bump into Crystal Gayle. :-)Best wishes,Karen> Hi, Karen!> It /was/ a great article. I've been looking forward to> it ever since I read your teaser.> They say that, in general, celebrities are shorter and> thinner than they appear on screen. (I saw Leonardo> DiCaprio in L.A., and he was soooooooo skinny!) I> guess it's true that the camera adds pounds.> Ally
-------------
TAKE CARE WITH YOUR HAIR!
|
|