Want opinions about the "Farrah" hairstyle.
Printed From: HairBoutique.com
Category: Beautiful People, Beautiful Hair
Forum Name: Celebrity Hair Talk
Forum Description: The hair trials and tribulations of Celebrities
URL: https://talk.hairboutique.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=21600
Printed Date: July 27 2025 at 7:12pm
Topic: Want opinions about the "Farrah" hairstyle.
Posted By: Happyblonde
Subject: Want opinions about the "Farrah" hairstyle.
Date Posted: November 20 2000 at 5:30am
In the U.K. thyey are running the Farrah Fawcett biography on the biography channel (probably the exact same show that aired in the States, and I watched it because I like her hairstyles-I like the styles that basically were post-"farrah" hairstyles, that were variations on the famous style.
In one part of the biography, they show a clip of her getting out of a car and her hair was very full and mega layered all over. This was I think a few years after she was on "Charlies Angels" and it was layered from the crown to the ends and I think in the back, too. It was long, too, about midback. The style was a lot more layered than the original famous style. It was a short clip but did any poster notice the style and anyway what do you think about a person having this style nowadays? Frankly I don't think today's styles are that great except once in awhile and I think maybe this particular variation on the famous style style, whether in or out, is one of the sexiest styles to wear. What do you think,would a person just look out of date, or could these variations on the famous "farrah" style be considered a timeless classic look for hair? Hopefully someone here has seen the clip that i saw but feel free to post anyway.
I guess it goes without "writing" that I was thinking of getting this style and I used have a version of it when I was teenager. Right now I have long to my hips hair that I wear sometimes layered on the crown only but now trying to grow out the crown except for the bangs. Thanks.
Happyblonde
|
Replies:
Posted By: JES
Date Posted: November 20 2000 at 3:40pm
Actually, I kind of liked the very layered "Farrah" hair - I usually prefer short hair. It does lend itself to a sexy appeal. You do have to watch out that it doesn't overpower your face - you don't want to look like a lion. Also, what kind of time will it involve and are you willing to take that time (I don't know what is involved). I am always in favor of changing hairstyles - I think that too many people get stuck in a rut. Whatever you decide, keep us in touch.
-------------
|
Posted By: Happyblonde
Date Posted: November 22 2000 at 2:17am
Hi JES,
Thanks for the opinion. I wore this style in the early eighties, so I know how much time can be involved!:)
If I go through with it, my Husband will pay for a visit to Jose Eber as a birthday present to get the style from the stylist who, while I don't know if he was actually the original creator of the style, he definitely did variations on the look. However, this won't be probably for a little while, but I will keep you posted.
Happyblonde
-------------
|
Posted By: Tom P
Date Posted: December 18 2000 at 10:21pm
Reply to message: viewthread.asp?forum=AMB%5FAP139333248&id=4407&page=1#3.4410.1 - 3.4410.1 I loved that style. I think the shag has the greatest hair cut of all time. I always take notice of a women in that haircut. No matter if she is big, small fat or thin, there is something speacial about a women in that style.
If your husband is willing to forgo the money on the originator, take him up on it and post pictures.
-------------
|
Posted By: Happyblonde
Date Posted: December 19 2000 at 10:54am
Reply to message: viewthread.asp?forum=AMB%5FAP139333248&id=4407&page=1#3.4523.1 - 3.4523.1 Thanks Tom, still thinking about it!
Happyblonde
-------------
|
Posted By: Tom P
Date Posted: December 20 2000 at 7:12pm
Reply to message: viewthread.asp?forum=AMB%5FAP139333248&id=4407&page=1#3.4528.1 - 3.4528.1 I would love to see some pictures of you in that style. I might pay for it myself if you look that good in it.
-------------
|
Posted By: DaveDecker
Date Posted: December 21 2000 at 8:48am
Reply to message: viewthread.asp?forum=AMB%5FAP139333248&id=4407&page=1#3.4544.1 - 3.4544.1 What is this, the Personals Board? Back off, Tom.
-------------
|
Posted By: Tom P
Date Posted: December 21 2000 at 6:10pm
Reply to message: viewthread.asp?forum=AMB%5FAP139333248&id=4407&page=1#3.4550.1 - 3.4550.1 Personal board? Please! Trying to promote a great hair cut. The more with it the better.
-------------
|
Posted By: Jeffrey Hines
Date Posted: December 21 2000 at 6:17pm
Reply to message: viewthread.asp?forum=AMB%5FAP139333248&id=4407&page=1#3.4553.1 - 3.4553.1 quote:
Tom P originally wrote:
Reply to message: viewthread.asp?forum=AMB%5FAP139333248&id=4407&page=1#3.4550.1 - 3.4550.1 Personal board? Please! Trying to promote a great hair cut. The more with it the better.
Tom,
We want the women that visit this site to feel like they can share without men hitting on them. I don`t believe that you were intending to do that, but I suppose that it could be read that way.
------------- Jeffrey Hines
HairBoutique.com
|
Posted By: Charles Angels
Date Posted: December 22 2000 at 12:43pm
Speaking of Farrah Hair, I have a new website which deals with something very close to Farrah Hair. Instead of explaining here, take a look
-------------
|
Posted By: phil
Date Posted: December 22 2000 at 7:31pm
I don`t want to be a party pooper, but isn`t "Farrah" hair a bit, well, Retro?? I mean, to me it brings back the 70s, otherwise known as "The decade that style forgot". All those layers, was that not a bit excessive? I always thought she looked like someone dragged through a hedge backwards.
------------- phil
|
Posted By: Happyblonde
Date Posted: December 23 2000 at 7:01am
It was o.k., Tom, I wasn`t offended. Thanks to Dave but I was o.k. with being asked for pictures. Thanks to Jeff, too. I just don`t post pictures on the net.
Phil, some of those styles worn by women who try for the "Farrah" look really don`t get the look down right. I don`t really want the style she first was famous with, I want the post "Farrah" look (1978?) where it was layered more on the top and even more layered and down to mid back. Yeah, it has many layers and has a lion look, but I want that kind of a look. Thanks for your opinion, I did ask if people thought it was a classic or a dated look. However, I think your thinking of the "poster" look she had. Do you think the style I described is also too dated, or a classic?
Hope I get more opinions!
Thanks, Happyblonde
-------------
|
Posted By: Happyblonde
Date Posted: December 23 2000 at 7:13am
Reply to message: viewthread.asp?forum=AMB%5FAP139333248&id=4407&page=1#3.4557.1 - 3.4557.1 I can`t see the pictures. Can you tell me what might be wrong?
Thanks, Happyblonde
-------------
|
Posted By: Happyblonde
Date Posted: December 23 2000 at 7:14am
That was last reply was for "Charlie`s Angels". I get the text but no pictures.
Happyblond
-------------
|
Posted By: AggiePam
Date Posted: December 23 2000 at 8:17am
Reply to message: viewthread.asp?forum=AMB%5FAP139333248&id=4407&page=1#3.4564.1 - 3.4564.1 Yeah, I tried to see the Farrah pics too. I see all the other pics, but not Farrah`s!
PS Happyblonde...I know which look your thinking of, its the really layered look, not just the side wings, right? Its a cool look, especially if you don`t mind the maintenance. Also, you could always wear it up if you wanted to, and leave few pieces down for an easy option. Anyway, I think some of those looks are coming back so YOU would be helping to set a NEW trend so go for it!!
-------------
|
|