The Case for JLo
Printed From: HairBoutique.com
Category: Beautiful People, Beautiful Hair
Forum Name: Celebrity Hair Talk
Forum Description: The hair trials and tribulations of Celebrities
URL: https://talk.hairboutique.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=22389
Printed Date: October 27 2025 at 11:48pm
Topic: The Case for JLo
Posted By: Unregistered Guest
Subject: The Case for JLo
Date Posted: March 26 2002 at 8:42pm
| Always being in the minority, I`ll take to defending JLo`s 60`s inspired `do. I think most of us would agree the JLo`s hair is more often than not undernoticed -- based on other ultra-feminine aspects of her body (no need to spell "it" out). But why should we `rear` our ugly heads at the gorgeous Barbiesque hair bonanza that she displayed? Yes, maybe it was a tad to high, and yes, maybe it was a tad to wide, but let`s face it, most of us girls would give our eye teeth for hair like that (even if it was supplanted with a now ubiquitous fall). ;-) |
Replies:
Posted By: Gord
Date Posted: March 26 2002 at 9:23pm
|
I have no problem with the way Jenny`s (I refuse to say J-Lo) hair looked on Oscar night -- or most nights, except when she had that short curly wig-like thing on her head. It made me think se was going for a simpler, classier look than usual -- much the way Britney Spears did at the Grammy`s. ------------- |
Posted By: waggingtail
Date Posted: March 26 2002 at 9:31pm
|
No No NO - there is NO defense for that hairstyle. But yes, she does have lovely hair...g ------------- Be yourself - unless you suck...wags |
Posted By: AggiePam
Date Posted: March 26 2002 at 11:37pm
Yeah, except the difference is that Britney`s hair looked good!! :) ------------- |
Gord wrote: