Print Page | Close Window

Heather Graham - heavy bangs

Printed From: HairBoutique.com
Category: Beautiful People, Beautiful Hair
Forum Name: Celebrity Hair Talk
Forum Description: The hair trials and tribulations of Celebrities
URL: https://talk.hairboutique.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=23198
Printed Date: December 29 2025 at 10:08am


Topic: Heather Graham - heavy bangs
Posted By: Hal
Subject: Heather Graham - heavy bangs
Date Posted: June 12 2003 at 6:44am
http://www.wireimage.com/GalleryListing.asp?navtyp=SRH&logsrch=1&sfld= - http://www.wireimage.com/GalleryListing.asp?navtyp=SRH&logsrch=1&sfld=



Replies:
Posted By: Gord
Date Posted: June 12 2003 at 7:25am
As a fan of long bangs, she looks gorgeous. Bangs seem like a lot of work, though, keeping them straight and the right length and such. Plenty of in-front-of-the-mirror time, but in Heather's case, totally worth it.


Posted By: Isla Q.
Date Posted: June 12 2003 at 10:27am
Makes her look a little older IMO, and that's not good thing in Hollywood.

-------------


Posted By: Klaatu48
Date Posted: June 12 2003 at 10:49am
Originally posted by Gord Gord wrote:

As a fan of long bangs, she looks gorgeous. Bangs seem like a lot of work, though, keeping them straight and the right length and such. Plenty of in-front-of-the-mirror time, but in Heather's case, totally worth it.


I'll back Gord up here... I think she looks great.

-------------


Posted By: loveshorthair
Date Posted: June 12 2003 at 9:03pm
Too long. give me the scissors, I'll fix them.
Even though they are too long in my opinion, it is an improvement. I always thought she had too much forehead showing.


Posted By: Unregistered Guest
Date Posted: June 12 2003 at 11:54pm
Looking good!

http://www.dailyceleb.com/production/?view=event&eid=1396&cap=heather+graham - http://www.dailyceleb.com/production/?view=event&eid=1396&cap=heather+graham


Posted By: Hal
Date Posted: June 13 2003 at 6:46am
I think the length is ok.. they just need puffing up a little bit.

-------------


Posted By: Unregistered Guest
Date Posted: June 13 2003 at 11:32am
She is just too cute!


Posted By: Hal
Date Posted: June 13 2003 at 12:57pm
.

-------------


Posted By: cocoasmommy
Date Posted: June 14 2003 at 4:02pm
I knew this cut reminded me of something... looks like the cut Nicole Kidman was wearing last year. I think both cuts are absolutely awful. They both reminded me of Paul Williams or that kid that always guest starred on the Brady Bunch from the 70's. If you don't remember Paul Williams, take a look at:

http://www.bradyhour.com/sc8mm.JPG - http://www.bradyhour.com/sc8mm.JPG



-------------
Well if you're here and I'm here,
doesn't that make it 'our' time?


Posted By: Hal
Date Posted: June 14 2003 at 8:14pm
Originally posted by cocoasmommy cocoasmommy wrote:

I knew this cut reminded me of something... looks like the cut Nicole Kidman was wearing last year. I think both cuts are absolutely awful. They both reminded me of Paul Williams or that kid that always guest starred on the Brady Bunch from the 70's. If you don't remember Paul Williams, take a look at:

http://www.bradyhour.com/sc8mm.JPG - http://www.bradyhour.com/sc8mm.JPG


Gee thanks Coco.. I had almost forgotten he was ever on TV!



-------------


Posted By: Kramer
Date Posted: June 26 2008 at 8:19am

Heather on the set of a new movie.

http://img166.imageshack.us/img166/1180/sonofmourningfilming12yk4.jpg">  


-------------
Who has more fun than people?


Posted By: Hal
Date Posted: June 26 2008 at 8:58am

Geezzzzzzzz Kram... just start a new post!



Posted By: Kramer
Date Posted: June 26 2008 at 9:17am
Hal, don't be ashamed of your work. You're very talented.

-------------
Who has more fun than people?


Posted By: natasha
Date Posted: June 26 2008 at 2:11pm
Sorry, Gord, I kinda agree with Hal here. Bumping 5 year old threads is quite annoying.


Posted By: HAWG
Date Posted: June 26 2008 at 8:46pm
I disagree; I think it's great to go back to an old thread; gives a better point of reference.

-------------
HAWG


Posted By: Kramer
Date Posted: June 26 2008 at 10:38pm
Originally posted by natasha natasha wrote:

Sorry, Gord, I kinda agree with Hal here. Bumping 5 year old threads is quite annoying.
How can I put this as nicely as possible? How about, "I don't care."
 
You're very mean spirited when it comes to people on this board. I had a much longer answer written here, but thought, "what's the point?" If you don't like the way things are done, move on. Heck, you didn't even post a comment on Heather's hair.
 
Your opinions are no longer relative to me. I repeat. I don't care.


-------------
Who has more fun than people?


Posted By: makeitshort
Date Posted: June 27 2008 at 7:21am
Sorry Kramer/Gord.  From the Forum Rules & Guidelines:

• Please do not dig up ancient threads. If you wish to continue an old discussion (older than 1 month), please create a new thread and reference the old one in your post.


Posted By: Kramer
Date Posted: June 27 2008 at 9:42am
Thanks. One month doesn't seem like a very long time, but if it's the rule, it's the rule. I guess I can always provide a link to an "ancient" thread. HAWG said it best when he said the old threads provide a better point of reference. Otherwise, what's the point of having a search engine on here?

-------------
Who has more fun than people?


Posted By: natasha
Date Posted: June 27 2008 at 3:02pm
Mean spirited, huh? Well, thank you, Gord. And frell you, too.

Regarding Heather's hair: I opened a thread titled "Heather Graham - heavy bangs", scrolled past a dozen ancient posts to finally discover a photo with no bangs at all. What exactly was I supposed to comment on -- except for the inappropriateness of bumping an old thread with a misleading title?



Print Page | Close Window