Lisa Kudro
Printed From: HairBoutique.com
Category: Beautiful People, Beautiful Hair
Forum Name: Celebrity Hair Talk
Forum Description: The hair trials and tribulations of Celebrities
URL: https://talk.hairboutique.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=23377
Printed Date: January 11 2026 at 11:04am
Topic: Lisa Kudro
Posted By: Hal
Subject: Lisa Kudro
Date Posted: September 05 2003 at 7:12am
|
Short again.. and not good http://www.wireimage.com/GalleryListing.asp?navtyp=gls====34868 - http://www.wireimage.com/GalleryListing.asp?navtyp=gls====34868 |
Replies:
Posted By: Layers
Date Posted: September 05 2003 at 7:50am
|
It's not a bad length for her, it just needs a little style. ------------- |
Posted By: JerkyFlea
Date Posted: September 05 2003 at 7:58am
Been waiting for pix of the short cut. You gotta give Lisa credit, when she decides to cut her hair she doesn't go halfway. Which doesn't mean that she shouldn't consider that an option.  Anyway, a quick analysis of this: First, Lisa, for some reason, doesn't like the fact that her hair is naturally wavy/curly and straightens it constantly...even though it looks great full and wavy. Second, she keeps getting bangs cut (which you can tell she has if you look closely at the sides of the style around her forehead) and then pushes them back...even though she looks better with bangs. Third, she insists on parting it in the middle, even though she's looked great the few times she has broken down and gone with a side part. So, what am I saying here? That it looks like she actually has a pretty good short layered cut that (I'm guessing) looked pretty darn good when she first got it done and styled. Lisa, like many women when they get a new cut, unfortunately has fallen into the habit of trying to style it the same way she styled her long, unlayered style. Which never works. Ever. So, give her a bit of leeway here to see if she lets it get a bit fuller, wavier, bangier, and/or side-partedier (yeah, so that's not a word, big deal) before we pronounce it an unmitigated failure. By the way, anyone want to bet they just make here wear a wig or extensions all season to play Phoebe? Never understood why Phoebe couldn't have short hair. All of the other women did at some point. Go figure. JF ------------- 3 pm is simultaneously too late and too early to start anything. |
Posted By: Unregistered Guest
Date Posted: September 05 2003 at 9:44am
|
I saw her several weeks ago on some talk show, and her hair was this short, but styled MUCH better. Very similar to the popular Reese Witherspoon cut, very full with a side part and all the flippy layers around. Looked adorable. I'm happy to see Lisa try a shorter length, but certainly agree this ain't the way to style it. Lisa, please, let your volume, waves, and curls show! That goes for the rest of you, too! :-) Also curious to see how it appears on Friends. I really hope they don't cover it up with a wig this time. What, the flakiest character on the show can't change her hair length? |
Posted By: princessmonica
Date Posted: September 05 2003 at 11:52am
|
just adding my 2 cents about not letting her wear her hair short on ''friends''. her character on the show is a wacky, dizzy hippie. which they want i guess with long hair. that way she can do at times odd updos that fit her character. also no offense to lisa. she is getting older looking and the long hair with bangs softens her. with the money they get paid they have no reason to complain. if her chartacter calls for long hair then thats that. they only let lisa wear her hair short once on the show. when they thought if things were different. lisa was a business women. i honestly can't see her chartacter with short hair as a goofy hippie. again just my 2 cents  ------------- http://www.msnusers.com/monicasanders - http://www.msnusers.com/monicasanders |
Posted By: Rod
Date Posted: September 05 2003 at 12:41pm
|
I agree with Monica. Phoebe isn't one to do much of anything with her hair. I can't see her going to a salon and getting a trendy shorter cut. Monica and Rachel, yes, but not Phoebe. Lisa may be tired of long hair, but I doubt her character Phoebe ever would be. ------------- |
Posted By: makeitshort
Date Posted: September 05 2003 at 2:05pm
I agree, but what about Ursula? |
Rod wrote:Posted By: princessmonica
Date Posted: September 05 2003 at 2:29pm
they hardly show her. plus they have ursula as the sterotype of a dizzy blond with long hair. ------------- http://www.msnusers.com/monicasanders - http://www.msnusers.com/monicasanders |
Posted By: Hal
Date Posted: September 15 2003 at 10:22am
|
There was a great picture of Lisa in the parade section of the news paper Sunday... her hair was styled very nice and you could really see the details of her cut... look MUCH better than the wireimage pics of her! ------------- |
Posted By: hairalways
Date Posted: September 15 2003 at 11:13am
|
I think it looks sleek and chic on her!! Really does make her look more youthful and hip. The long hair, in my opinion was dragging her face down. Jacqui ------------- |
Posted By: enfys
Date Posted: September 15 2003 at 1:06pm
|
She looks kind of like there is somthing missing. I don't know what it is, but it looks a little odd. Maybe it looks better styled. I don't watch friends, but with what I know about her character this won't work. Ah well. ------------- http://www.myspace.com/waltzin_with_the_open_sea - http://www.myspace.com/waltzin_with_the_open_sea Ah-ha, a place I can soon add hair pics...once I do some |
Posted By: Unregistered Guest
Date Posted: September 20 2003 at 9:00am
| This is part of the whole Hollywood hair goes above the shoulders trend for fall & winter. Look for it to have big and full bouncy curls soon too. It's no longer an underground trend, America's ready for a new glamour and this look's going mainstream. Keep an eye out for who's next. This length was my prediction for Jennifer Anniston--not sure now. |