Print Page | Close Window

Janet Jackson

Printed From: HairBoutique.com
Category: Beautiful People, Beautiful Hair
Forum Name: Celebrity Hair Talk
Forum Description: The hair trials and tribulations of Celebrities
URL: https://talk.hairboutique.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=23681
Printed Date: January 14 2026 at 5:18am


Topic: Janet Jackson
Posted By: Gord
Subject: Janet Jackson
Date Posted: February 01 2004 at 10:43pm
What did y'all think about Janet Jackson during the halftime show of the Super Bowl? I loved her long hair flying all over the stage. While I know verylittle of it is actually her own hair, I think it suits her -- and has always suited her.

What happened when her brest became exposed? Did her costume malfunction or did Justin Timberlake expose it?

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/040202/483/sbx18102020149 - http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/040202/483/sbx18102020149

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/040202/1906/f020125ajpg - http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/040202/1906/f020125ajpg



Replies:
Posted By: Unregistered Guest
Date Posted: February 01 2004 at 10:49pm
Talentless, ratty haired nothing - the cheesiest super bowl halftime in years


Posted By: Hal
Date Posted: February 02 2004 at 6:57am
As always Janet is hot but her hair looked more like plastic than hair.

-------------


Posted By: caramia
Date Posted: February 04 2004 at 7:28am
I couldn't stand the long bangs in her eyes. And btw it was the worst half time show I can remember.


Posted By: pixie lady
Date Posted: February 04 2004 at 9:43pm
No her breast wasn't exposed by accident, Janet and Justin Timberlake planned it, Janet has as much as admitted that now and apologized for it.

I don't know why she said she was sorry, it was only exposed for a fraction of a second, they showed it on cable news and you could hardly even notice. It wasn't exposed long enough to "corrupt" the kiddies or the prudes watching it on T.V., and it wasn't exposed long enough to get the guys horny either, so it was useless in that way too (tee-hee!)
It was just a little thing that lasted a fraction of a second.
Geeeeeeez Big deal.
Yet the media is making a big deal out of it, which I am sure is what Janet wanted, her career needs a boost, just like Madonna and Britany doing the kiss, although that was sexy!

Janet Jackson is the only one in that family I like, she is beautiful and seems nice and isn't a pedophile or anything like her brother, so it doesn't bother me if it helps her career. That's ok with me.

-------------


Posted By: Hal
Date Posted: February 05 2004 at 7:14am
Originally posted by pixie lady pixie lady wrote:

No her breast wasn't exposed by accident, Janet and Justin Timberlake planned it, Janet has as much as admitted that now and apologized for it.

I don't know why she said she was sorry, it was only exposed for a fraction of a second, they showed it on cable news and you could hardly even notice. It wasn't exposed long enough to "corrupt" the kiddies or the prudes watching it on T.V., and it wasn't exposed long enough to get the guys horny either, so it was useless in that way too (tee-hee!)
It was just a little thing that lasted a fraction of a second.
Geeeeeeez Big deal.
Yet the media is making a big deal out of it, which I am sure is what Janet wanted, her career needs a boost, just like Madonna and Britany doing the kiss, although that was sexy!

Janet Jackson is the only one in that family I like, she is beautiful and seems nice and isn't a pedophile or anything like her brother, so it doesn't bother me if it helps her career. That's ok with me.


And this has what to do with hair...........?

-------------


Posted By: pixie lady
Date Posted: February 05 2004 at 11:08pm
Gord asked the question about Janet's breast being exposed, so I answered it.
Besides Hal, you know how these boards sometimes drift off topic.

-------------



Print Page | Close Window