Nicole Kidman - Pixie
Printed From: HairBoutique.com
Category: Beautiful People, Beautiful Hair
Forum Name: Celebrity Hair Talk
Forum Description: The hair trials and tribulations of Celebrities
URL: https://talk.hairboutique.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=23736
Printed Date: October 09 2025 at 11:42pm
Topic: Nicole Kidman - Pixie
Posted By: makeitshort
Subject: Nicole Kidman - Pixie
Date Posted: February 23 2004 at 1:21pm
http://www.wireimage.com/GalleryListing.asp?navtyp=gls====52329&nbc1=1 - http://www.wireimage.com/GalleryListing.asp?navtyp=gls====52329&nbc1=1
Has to be a wig.
|
Replies:
Posted By: Laine1998
Date Posted: February 23 2004 at 3:37pm
Oh my..
I do hope that is a wig. She always has had very nice looking hair.
-------------
|
Posted By: Rod
Date Posted: February 23 2004 at 4:29pm
It is a wig. About a year ago, "Birth" was in production and Ms. Kidman showed up on set one day with that wig. It created a stir in the press, and on this board, because it doesn't look like a wig and people wondered how Kidman would fit all her hair under it.
http://www.thezreview.co.uk/comingsoon/b/birth.shtm - http://www.thezreview.co.uk/comingsoon/b/birth.shtm
On "Extra," they revealed it be a wig. And Kidman did in fact have long hair at Cannes a few months later. I can only assume the wig is there to show a passage of time. I think she is 10 years older later in the film than she is at the beginning. And most women change their hair in 10 years.
They've gone back for reshoots. As far as I know, Kidman only filmed "Stepford Wives" after "Birth," so there was time earlier. They may want to shoot in winter, as that's when they shot last year.
Since it was a wig a year ago, it certainly is now. Hairdressers wouldn't want to chance replicating a wig with a real haircut. Better to play it safe.
Apparently, everyone in the media isn't aware of it.
http://www.couriermail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,8760396%255E953,00.html - http://www.couriermail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,8760396%255E953,00.html
I think Nicole Kidman has such great features that she'd look great in any haircut. Many women can't pull off a pixie, and I'm not sure that Natalie Portman can based on those "Closer" pictures. On Nicole Kidman, it looks incredible. I'll go out on a limb and say that anyone who doesn't think she looks great in short hair just doesn't like short hair on any woman. I'm not saying that you have to like the short hair over her long hair only that she has to be one of the best looking women with short hair.
That said, long hair or short, she looks great either way.
-------------
|
Posted By: Unregistered Guest
Date Posted: February 23 2004 at 6:58pm
|
I'm glad its a wig. I don't think that looks nice on her at all, maybe if she did cut it it might look better but since she looks bad in the wig if I were her I would not chance it, and i usually like short hair!
|
Posted By: Kuroneko
Date Posted: February 24 2004 at 1:20am
I love that wig, but I think her face has become too harsh for it. She's gotten to the point she looks like a transvestite even with her own long hair, so that wig is likely to only intensify that effect, unfortunately. Even in the tiny thumbnails there she looks too harsh for the style-- it makes her look kinda like a Vulcan :-P . Maybe if she'd worn it five or ten years ago when she didn't look quite as bad, it would've been nicer.
-------------
More awesome than a manatee!
|
Posted By: rardman
Date Posted: February 24 2004 at 8:22am
|
I think it's vile. She looks like shes been ill. I think it's the way the bang was texurized that I find so distracting.She does have a face, I agree, that can pull of almost any length or style, but this looks like shes playing a prisoner of war or something...
|
|