Brittney...Latest pic
Printed From: HairBoutique.com
Category: Beautiful People, Beautiful Hair
Forum Name: Celebrity Hair Talk
Forum Description: The hair trials and tribulations of Celebrities
URL: https://talk.hairboutique.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=29133
Printed Date: November 24 2025 at 7:01pm
Topic: Brittney...Latest pic
Posted By: rardman
Subject: Brittney...Latest pic
Date Posted: March 26 2005 at 7:05am
In the other two posts, the colour and length(current extensions) are
discussed. Here's a new pic that illustrates both quite well. Not
bad, imo! |
Replies:
Posted By: johnny
Date Posted: March 26 2005 at 7:24am
| She looks good. For a change. |
Posted By: Klaatu48
Date Posted: March 26 2005 at 11:45am
|
I love the color on her. Looks a whole lot better than the
over-processed blonde. The length is nice, too, but I prefer her with
more bangs.
------------- |
Posted By: Mike46019
Date Posted: March 26 2005 at 12:13pm
|
I like it who knows how long it's going to last LOL. ------------- Few men are killed by the bayonet;many are scared by it.Bayonets should be fixed when the fire fight starts.General George Patton Jr.,War As I Knew It,1947. |
Posted By: natasha
Date Posted: March 26 2005 at 1:51pm
Since posting the same picture to two different Britney threads wasn't enough, you now started a third Britney thread, so you could post the same picture yet again? Brilliant thinking, man ... |
rardman wrote:Posted By: rardman
Date Posted: March 26 2005 at 3:25pm
|
Natasha, The point, which was clearly lost on you i guess, was that the other two threads covered two different topics(length/colour).Neither thread had a pic. When I found the pic this morning, I added it to the relavent posts, as it illustrated both well. The reason to start the new thread was that, as I said in the subject line, it was the "latest pic". Since both of the other related threads had been up for a few days, and had been viewed to death by now, I started this other thread because many of us who are at the site daily, do not always feel the need to re-read the same threads day after day. Ergo, the pic would not be seen by as many members. This way, I was just ensuring that those who came daily, and didn't re-read each and every thread that they read the day before(and the day before...), would actually get to see the pic. Sorry if I wasted what must be some of your extra-specially important time. Nobody else seemed offended. Or, perhaps you personally pay for the site hosting, or bandwidth.Sorry if I wasted valuable space. Maybe, you are just in charge of monitoring the whole,"brilliant thinking" thing. Quite frankly, I am not sure. I just hope you didn't lose sleep. |
Posted By: eKatherine
Date Posted: March 26 2005 at 3:51pm
|
I'm trying to follow your logic here, but you've lost me. People do not come here daily and re-read the threads to see if there's been new posts, or not re-read them because they've read them before. They look at the little icon on the left of the thread and see that there's been new posts to the thread. It's not apparent until you've opened the thread that the new posts are duplicates of other posts to similar titles. So everybody who's still interested is going to end up opening all three threads.
And even if it did work that way, you've just given more threads they have to open and read for nothing new. When you decide to start a new thread instead of reply to current threads, you make it harder for people to follow the conversation, or even to figure out that there is a conversation outside of your multiple postings. It dilutes whats there and makes people wonder what's going on with you that you would need to bombard the board with similar posts. |
Posted By: rardman
Date Posted: March 26 2005 at 4:18pm
|
eKatherine, Thank you for your feedback. This will be my last post in defence of my earlier actions(posted a pic more than once...), but I'll try to explain.I now feel like I am actually wasting space(this is a forum for the discussion of celebrity hair, not a chat room). Every morning when I get to the salon. I ask our receptionist, who has already been to the site, "Any new threads/pics?".At this point,she either says yes, at which point we all gather to take a peek, or she says"nope, same old, same old, /nothing new". Now I really enjoy reading the opinions of other members, which I do when I am afforded the time to, but if a post has been around for a bit, it's not often that I will re-visit it. I will go once, often twice to see feedback, and thats usually it. I added the pic to the appropriate threads when I found it, but then thought, many people will not see it. Sure many would, but lots would not even open the other Brittney threads at this point, as they were getting a bit old. I thought, well , for those who won't re-open those threads, I just wanted to draw their attention to what I felt was a relavent, noteworthy pic. It was not my intention to "bombard the board with similar posts". A sincere apology to anyone who's time I wasted, but I don't feel I did anything that wrong. |
Posted By: johnny
Date Posted: March 26 2005 at 4:49pm
|
radman, dude, totally get where you are coming from.i only found this website a week ago, and just decided to join.i was just checking in again to see if there was anything new. i don't see what you are being ragged on for.i had already checked out those other brittney postings for a day or so ago,so i wouldn't have headed back to them.i checked out the one that said "latest picture", or whatever, because i figured it was new.otherwise, i would have not even seen the picture in question.so dude,good job. so, 'gj on starting the new one. people need to lighten up i think. i thought this was a cool place where people talked about stars do's.i mean, were not curing cancer here people.so you had to look at the same picture more than once.geez.hope ya survive. |
Posted By: johnny
Date Posted: March 26 2005 at 4:51pm
| and once again, she still looks here. |
Posted By: eKatherine
Date Posted: March 26 2005 at 5:20pm
You're asking the wrong question. Instead of asking "Are there any new threads?" you should ask "Are there any new posts to our threads?" Look at the little envelope to the left of the thread. If there are new posts since your computer was last at this site, there will be a little note going in it. Older threads will not have this. It'll save you a whole lot of time if you don't search all threads for new posts. |
Posted By: rardman
Date Posted: March 26 2005 at 6:40pm
|
eKatherine, Here I am again, despite my promise to let this die. Now , I am of the opinion that we utilize the board in different ways. When you say "i should ask" if there are "any new posts to our threads" instead of "are there new threads/pics", I think the point becomes clear. I go to this site to see if there are any cool (or not...), new developments in the world of celebrity hair. I am interested first and foremost in trends, and recent developments in celebrity hair. Second to that, I am interested in the opinions of other members. Thirdly, I would check to see if "my/our posts" got any response.The third, is not a huge issue for me. I don't care if there are or not. I'm not seeking validation, although I hope occasionally to inspire some discussion. I understand how the board works. I know what "the little envelope to the left of the thread" means. Sometimes people zip in, and zip out, on sites like this. I know I do, as do many people I know . My "latest pic" thread was , I guess, for members like me. People who sometimes have only a momemt or two to check in to see the latest.I love when I have nothing better to do than just cruise leisurely through the site, but sometimes, I just care to see whats new.That being said, thank you agin for your input. I would welcome further discussion if you like, but feel it would be better servrd if done through e--mail.... feel free to repond to rardman@hotmail.com All the best. P.S. So, ster all this, what do you think of her hair?...lol |
Posted By: johnny
Date Posted: March 27 2005 at 1:35am
|
dude, stop apologizing to these cows.clearly they have WAYYYYY to much time on their hands if have time to rant about the "proper" way to use a discussion/message board.as i said bro, i wouldn't have even seen the new pic if you had not started a new thread/topic.I had been to the other postings a few times, read them, and would not have gone back.isn't that the point you were making? well, english is my first language, so i got it.and, i appreciated that you took the time to start the new thread.otherwise, i would not have had a "visual' relax dude.besides, did you see that chicks hair?""hello, 1982 called and they want that tired braided updo "thingy" back that was passable(at best) then.today, it's a hair crime(felony-not mis). chill bro, and keep posting. |
Posted By: Alyssa_
Date Posted: March 27 2005 at 5:51am
| I think eKatherine's hair is gorgeous. No need to go throwing around personal insults just because you disagree with her point of view. |
Posted By: johnny
Date Posted: March 27 2005 at 7:40am
|
|
Posted By: eKatherine
Date Posted: March 27 2005 at 9:18am
| I'm not sure that calling women "cows" is as much a personal insult as a reflection of the mind of the would-be insulter. In any case, it would not do for such a person to take instruction on how the board operates from a lowly female, especially one with hair so much better than his. |
Posted By: DaveDecker
Date Posted: March 27 2005 at 1:03pm
 Hilarious. I love your
sense of humor, eKatherine. And re: Johnny's criticism of your
hairstyle being dated, well, I'm absolutely certain that his hairstyle
is entirely unique and never-been-seen-before in hairstyling
history. Sure, of course Okay Johnny,this warning's for you. Please refrain from insulting other people here. Consider this fair warning. And I'll ask everybody (without naming individual) to attempt refrain from creating multiple threads about the same celebrity such as was the case with Britney Spear's latest extended hairstyle. ------------- |
Posted By: rardman
Date Posted: March 27 2005 at 6:58pm
|
Johnny, This appears to way out of hand. I in no way would insult a fellow member's hair(regardless of what I thought of it), or insult them on any level in a public forum. Although I suppose, this was done "in my defense", I would ask that you don't do it again, especially where it has to do with me or my postings. Thank you for your support, but no more insults...k? Katherine, I apologize for you having to be insulted publiclly like that. I feel it was uncalled for. Dave Decker, I agree with warning Johnny not to insult people here. What he did was inappropriate. However, did you read the posts that preceeded his.Granted, he was a bit more up front with his insults, but can you say the tone of Natasha's little post wasn't a tad insulting to me? Guess thats allright though? No warning for her? So I committed what has turned out to be a huge cardinal sin(multiple posting!!!), which incidentlly I have seen here before to far less outcry. I will not do it again. There was a much nicer way for the members who seem to know best, to convey their ideas and sentiments. Anyway , Once Again I apologize, and Good Day To All |
Posted By: amymusic
Date Posted: March 28 2005 at 10:03am
|
ANYWAYS I love Britney's new hue. I love the base color against her tan, and I think the honey streaks are enough blonde for her. I hope she says goodbye to bleach from now on, least just sticking to the highlights she has now. Thumbs up. ------------- |
Posted By: deltagirl12345
Date Posted: March 28 2005 at 11:48am
|
Hi Hi: I really like the color and style. I think she would look better with bangs. Susan
------------- Susan |
Posted By: DaveDecker
Date Posted: March 28 2005 at 9:13pm
A tad, yes. But just a tad. Considerably less insulting than Johnny was ("cows").
No. Did you not understand that my request was simply for courtesy? I still don't understand why you couldn't manage to slim down 3 britney-has-extensions-now-again threads down to 1. ? ------------- |
Posted By: rardman
Date Posted: March 29 2005 at 6:10am
|
Dave First off, my apologies. i just re-read this whole thing beginning to end, and find my self a bit embarrassed. The tone of a few of my replies was a bit snippy, and for that I am sorry. I was feeling a bit defensive iI guess. I totally understood your request. Won't happen again! Also, when I put up my initial Brittney thread nearly two weeks ago(reporting her colour change), I saw no other Brittney thread. Then, the other thread(started by a member named Douglas -commenting on her extensions)) popped a week or so after that.As it turns out, his thread is in fact a month old, and just wasn't responded to for over three weeks. Thats how the multiple thread started. I just didn't see his. I don't always go that far back. I've explained a few times why I added the "latest pic" thread, (which still makes a fair bit of sense to me-*but which I'd never do again**), and sort of thought, well there's two anyway-no biggie. We won't be doing that again anytime soon. Anyway, thanks, I get it! Cheers, rardman |