i am truly sorry HERE ARE THE NEW KIM PIC
Printed From: HairBoutique.com
Category: Hair Talk
Forum Name: Short Hair
Forum Description: Devoted to the special needs of short hair
URL: https://talk.hairboutique.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=33081
Printed Date: April 30 2025 at 3:49am
Topic: i am truly sorry HERE ARE THE NEW KIM PIC
Posted By: lovebobs
Subject: i am truly sorry HERE ARE THE NEW KIM PIC
Date Posted: July 17 2005 at 11:50am
|
i have not been able to get on the computer at all anyway its 2 weeks later but here are the 2 new pics of her hair chopping plus an older one of her really long hair a few years ago the pics are out of order #59 is right after she got it cut all one length #60 is right before we went to the salon for the short cut #61 is from when her hair was super long well? lemme know if yas like it SHE IS NOT WEARING THE SHERIFF SHIRT!!!! btw do u notice her pregnant belly?????? http://www.imagestation.com/album/?id=4286469039& amp;congratulation_page=y ------------- Long with BLUNT bangs or ALL cut to lip length, I cant decide my favorite! |
Replies:
Posted By: eKatherine
Date Posted: July 17 2005 at 12:18pm
Actually, it looks longer than ever, nowhere near the "just a tad below lip length" you said it was cut to. And she doesn't look pregnant to me. I'm a little tired of seeing these pix that are taken from really weird angles. You have to tell us what they are showing because the pictures show something else entirely. ------------- 
Just looking for a few good hair slaves - is that too much to ask? |
lovebobs wrote:
Posted By: lovebobs
Date Posted: July 17 2005 at 12:22pm
|
what the hell are you talking about #59 is the latest pic thats right after she cut it and that is a TAD below her lips are you blind!!!!!! ------------- Long with BLUNT bangs or ALL cut to lip length, I cant decide my favorite! |
Posted By: Robocop
Date Posted: July 17 2005 at 4:57pm
|
What a let down. I for one can’t notice any discernable difference from the previous “cut”. Again we see multiple posts/threads started by you (Lovebobs). One thread starts and while we wait for an update (for what seems like an eternity) you start yet another, finishing off what you started 2+ weeks ago. While we all no doubt applaud you for keeping us all informed of Kim’s news on the haircut front, you do yourself no favours in the way in which you supply it. Please let us know after it’s actually being done and let us have a link to the photos then and not the half a*sed way it’s being done at present. Don’t forget also, to do this all in ONE thread. Anyway, hope all goes ok on the baby side of things. |
Posted By: JohnnyQuest
Date Posted: July 17 2005 at 7:40pm
| Looks great, thanks for the update and it does look a bit shorter to me. A straight on shot would answer all the questions. Keep the pics comin bro. |
Posted By: Heratic
Date Posted: July 18 2005 at 12:59am
|
I have to agree that after all this time having only one photo post-cut is a let down - and also due to the weird angle its taken from you can't see much other than its a bob of indeterminate length. How are we supposed to tell if Kim looks pregnant from these two photos??
------------- Its your hair, your choice and your decision |
Posted By: Longhairdreams
Date Posted: July 20 2005 at 12:37am
|
wow your wife looks really really young.I would have sworn she was no older than 16! And I'm confused who karen is.I kept confusing her with kim? ------------- 
|
Posted By: lovebobs
Date Posted: July 21 2005 at 7:05pm
|
karen is kims younger sister (20) kim is 24 they look different karen is the skinnier one ------------- Long with BLUNT bangs or ALL cut to lip length, I cant decide my favorite! |