Ann Curry’s Haircut
Printed From: HairBoutique.com
Category: Beautiful People, Beautiful Hair
Forum Name: Celebrity Hair Talk
Forum Description: The hair trials and tribulations of Celebrities
URL: https://talk.hairboutique.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=36024
Printed Date: January 01 2026 at 7:33pm
Topic: Ann Curry’s Haircut
Posted By: Ben C
Subject: Ann Curry’s Haircut
Date Posted: October 04 2005 at 8:59pm
|
I am starting a new thread because the old one kind of got sidetracked on what Locks of Love is about. I am mainly curious to see when Ann will cut her hair, how long it will be at that time, how much they will cut and what it will look like when it's short? Not sure how much hair Ann will have left if they cut 10 inches or so off. I'm guess she will still have hair that is near shoulder length? What do you guys think? |
Replies:
Posted By: 94harley
Date Posted: October 04 2005 at 10:13pm
| If she waits till december to cut I'd say she'd still have shoulder length or a tad longer if only 10 inches required. but she's the only one who knows how much is being cut till that day,she may not have decided how short to go yet. some comments she's said hints she likes it long since grown it out so maybe not to much. |
Posted By: Mike46019
Date Posted: October 05 2005 at 6:54am
|
Well if it hits her waist(Ladies out there with this lenght could give us a ball park figure foot and half?)that is 18" take 10 off that 8 would be mid back? ------------- Few men are killed by the bayonet;many are scared by it.Bayonets should be fixed when the fire fight starts.General George Patton Jr.,War As I Knew It,1947. |
Posted By: fatmoogas
Date Posted: October 05 2005 at 7:38am
| Maybe she wants to give lol as much as possible? |
Posted By: Kramer
Date Posted: October 05 2005 at 9:23am
| And all for the sake of @!%$$@#% ratings. |
Posted By: S_Miller
Date Posted: October 05 2005 at 9:47am
|
I think that the people who think that Ann's cut will be a drastic change will be disappointed. Cutting 10 inches for her already very long hair won't look a whole lot different when they show her reading the news. ------------- Stephanie |
Posted By: Mike46019
Date Posted: October 05 2005 at 1:26pm
|
Still it's a lot to give. I just hope it's more hipe then real. How many times has this been out there and nothing? Or this new report we can say is real? ------------- Few men are killed by the bayonet;many are scared by it.Bayonets should be fixed when the fire fight starts.General George Patton Jr.,War As I Knew It,1947. |
Posted By: loveshorthair
Date Posted: October 05 2005 at 2:34pm
|
Just a hunch, but those wanting a dramatic cut will probably be disappointed. I got a feeling it will be a little longer than shoulder length with some layering after all is done. Any takers on that bet? |
Posted By: Hal
Date Posted: October 05 2005 at 3:38pm
|
Ratings? I can assure you her hair has NOTHING to do with rating. The few hair freaks the visit here are the only one that have more than a slight interest in Anne's hair. Don't forget, even though we have found comfort in our numbers... we are all freeks! |
Kramer wrote:Posted By: Bob S
Date Posted: October 05 2005 at 5:22pm
 Seeing Ann Curry is the ONLY reason I ever tune in the Today Show. She looks to be a stunning 30-35 year old now. I can't believe she's 49! Her long hair is her Fountain of Youth, IMO. I'll bet a million folks flick the remote in hopes of seeing her every day. Best, Bob 
|
Posted By: Kramer
Date Posted: October 05 2005 at 7:05pm
|
Posted By: Ben C
Date Posted: October 05 2005 at 7:26pm
|
I think you are probably right that it won't be as dramatic a change as people were initially thinking. Part of that is that she has waited longer than we thought to do it. If she had done the donation back in May, she would be looking at pretty short hair left. Now though it's going to be much more her option. If she cuts only the 10 inch minimum then she will probably still have hair around her shoulders or maybe just above it. Ten inches is still a lot of hair and if she goes for more like 12, then it will look a lot different. I don't expect her to cut as much off as she possibly could. Who knows though? I guess we'll find out in about 2 months. |
Posted By: Rod
Date Posted: October 05 2005 at 9:06pm
|
If she talks about it on the air, and possibly does it on air, it's a stunt to
publicize LoL and promote the "Today Show." People like to watch makeovers and makeovers of celebs is that x... well something. Thus far though it's only been in two pubs that I know of. That's fairly under the radar. I imagine this is a charity Anne believes in or she wouldn't donate. It's always a good idea to promote your charities any chance you get. Charities always need publicity. |
Posted By: Mike46019
Date Posted: October 06 2005 at 7:43am
|
Ok lets say two feet by the time it's to her waist? 24 " total
If she goes 10" you still have 14 that would be what mid back? Still that would be nice to see. Or do you all think it's going waist to chin? ------------- Few men are killed by the bayonet;many are scared by it.Bayonets should be fixed when the fire fight starts.General George Patton Jr.,War As I Knew It,1947. |
Posted By: fatmoogas
Date Posted: October 06 2005 at 10:28am
|
Could be a pixie, Mike. |
Posted By: Mike46019
Date Posted: October 06 2005 at 1:48pm
|
Nice I hope not. ------------- Few men are killed by the bayonet;many are scared by it.Bayonets should be fixed when the fire fight starts.General George Patton Jr.,War As I Knew It,1947. |
Posted By: Kramer
Date Posted: October 06 2005 at 9:40pm
|
On The Today Show, Ann rarely wears her hair down these days. And when she does, it's usually behind her back. She also seems to wear it up when out in public. I'm thinking she doesn't want people to get used to her with long, gorgeous hair. http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/details_pop.aspx?iid=55868336&cdi=0 - http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/details_pop.a spx?iid=55868336&cdi=0 http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/details_pop.aspx?iid=55868334&cdi=0 - http://editorial.gettyimages.com/source/search/details_pop.a spx?iid=55868334&cdi=0 I'll be bummed out if the day comes that Ann once again has shorter hair than Katie Couric. |
Posted By: fatmoogas
Date Posted: October 06 2005 at 9:43pm
| If that's typical of what she's trying to get people used to, then she must have decided to go for some ultra short style. |
Posted By: 94harley
Date Posted: October 07 2005 at 12:51am
| hope not jst gettin us use to shorter hair that's all really hope it stays long!!!!!!! |
Posted By: Carmichael
Date Posted: October 07 2005 at 11:26am
|
Ann really can't afford a major a major change in her look as the
network is setting her up to be a major news anchor someday. For the
same reason I predict that there will be no haircut sideshow either.
Due to the general preponderance of long to medium hairstyles on female
anchors I also predict Ann's haircut will be a disapointment for the
short hair lovers. ------------- "Your so vain, you probably think this post is about you." |
Posted By: Mike46019
Date Posted: October 08 2005 at 4:11pm
|
Carmichael I hope you are right. It would be a shame that after all this she goes back to her short days. ------------- Few men are killed by the bayonet;many are scared by it.Bayonets should be fixed when the fire fight starts.General George Patton Jr.,War As I Knew It,1947. |
Posted By: 94harley
Date Posted: October 10 2005 at 7:36am
| They had Ann's Intimate Portrait on lLifetime last nite. Toward the end she talked a little about daughters suggestion of growing hair long, Ann couldn't say no. She said now her hair is driving her nuts. Katie's comment was good thing to do together with daugther but do it soon cause getting really long like Pochantis. So it could be a dramatic cut. Hopefully not for I like it really on her fantastic! |
Posted By: fatmoogas
Date Posted: October 10 2005 at 11:45am
|
What's the betting? Is she going to wind up like this?
Like this?
Or like this?
|
Posted By: 94harley
Date Posted: October 10 2005 at 1:26pm
| I'm hoping for the first pic long enough but also short enough for good donation and shouldn't drive her to nuts to keep it |
Posted By: S_Miller
Date Posted: October 10 2005 at 2:12pm
|
If we are voting....#2 ------------- Stephanie |
Posted By: loveshorthair
Date Posted: October 10 2005 at 4:10pm
| Want the 3rd one but it will probably the 2nd one. |
Posted By: Rod
Date Posted: October 10 2005 at 9:24pm
|
Anne's hair was around the middle of her back today. When she wears it
down, she does one of the least attractive things I can think of: she brushes it straight back. A side part at any length is preferrable. A center part or some bangs aren't bad, but straight back is just awful. Of course, if all you do is put it up all the time I guess that's how you have it. I don't care what length she goes to, as long as she does something more attractive than she has now. Long hair can be beautiful, but she makes it boring. |
Posted By: Mike46019
Date Posted: October 11 2005 at 6:30am
|
Voteing for #1 I thinking we are going to see #3. Just because of rateing. ------------- Few men are killed by the bayonet;many are scared by it.Bayonets should be fixed when the fire fight starts.General George Patton Jr.,War As I Knew It,1947. |
Posted By: Kramer
Date Posted: October 11 2005 at 10:31am
|
Ann wore her hair up again this morning. <Yawn.> Is it driving her nuts because A) she has to get up so early in the morning and doesn't have time to get her hair ready, B) she's lazy, C) it gets in her way when it's down or D) she doesn't like her hair long? Ann, please satisfy us longhair lovers while you have it and wear it down once in awhile! |
Posted By: DesertDavid
Date Posted: October 28 2005 at 10:41am
|
Of all the newscasters, Ann has the best hair, up or down. I like women with long hair and am a fan of updos as well. It would be a shame if Ann ever got a haircut of any kind. She should let it grow to her waist before she even thinks about a trim. "Locks of Love" is a SCAM. They don't use the hair they obtain to make wigs for kids with cancer. What they do is hoodwink women into parting with their crowning glory so they can SELL the hair to obtain money in return. THEN they use the money to buy a MINIMAL number of wigs for the children. They keep the difference as profit. Some reporter ought to invesigate them and expose them. That would be a great story for Ann to do. "Locks of Love" needs to be put out of business!
|
Posted By: dalton024200
Date Posted: October 28 2005 at 2:31pm
| I would love to see her cut it short, above her ears again. |
Posted By: Rod
Date Posted: October 28 2005 at 9:07pm
I don't want to kill another thread, but while there are some facts in this statement, it is inaccurate. Some people think if they keep saying inaccurate things about Locks of Love, they'll get people to believe them. |
Posted By: DesertDavid
Date Posted: October 29 2005 at 2:53pm
I obtained my information from the Better Business Bureau. There are
rumors which may or may not be true. Again, someone needs to
investigate the facts which exist apart from Locks' self-serving
statements. The way I see this organization, Locks decreases the number
of long-haired women and does it by not stating the whole truth about
its operations. 
|
Posted By: Rod
Date Posted: October 29 2005 at 4:20pm
What exactly did you obtain from the Better Business Bureau? There is a 3 year old statement on their site that Locks of Love complied with all their requirements but didn't provide one financial statement they requested. Since the Better Business Bureau is a private organization and not a public one, Locks of Love isn't required to give them all of their financial reports. The Better Business Bureau isn't a government organization, even though people believe it is. Perhaps someone should investigate the Better Business Bureau. People have read the information on the Better Business Bureau site and concluded that Locks of Love doesn't use all their ponytails. That may or may not be true. That said, Locks of Love isn't a scam. They don't use the hair they obtain to make wigs for kids with cancer and never said they did. They make wigs for children with alopecia, a difficult condition that my cousin has. If they didn't actually make these wigs, they would be a scam. But they make these wigs. They don't buy wigs. They make them. They do sell some hair to pay for their expenses. All charities have expenses. How should they pay these expenses? Locks of Love probably doesn't get a lot of cash donations, because people donate hair instead. If they have more hair than they can use, converting it to cash makes sense. All of these things are in their literature and on their website. There has never been any report that the money goes to line someone's pockets. That would be a scam. There is no profit. Locks of Love does decrease the number of long-haired women. So what? Isn't that the choice of the women? You seem to want to force women to keep their hair long. Anything that may encourage women to cut their hair is a scam, in your opinion. Thus you say "Locks of Love needs to be put out of business!" Well, sorry. You can't control women. They'll cut their hair if they want. Locks of Love is a quality charity. They may not do the most important work in the world and they don't correct people's misconceptions, but that doesn't mean they aren't doing good work. I know they are. |