Where is the Shrinkies Thread?
Printed From: HairBoutique.com
Category: Hair Extension Topics
Forum Name: Hair Extensions
Forum Description: Hair Extensions can be the quick fix for short hair.
URL: https://talk.hairboutique.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=40853
Printed Date: February 07 2026 at 8:33am
Topic: Where is the Shrinkies Thread?
Posted By: aninnina
Subject: Where is the Shrinkies Thread?
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 6:09pm
Am I blind or has the posting been removed?
Why? Was it too aggressive? 
|
Replies:
Posted By: toobz
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 6:26pm
Yes it does seem to be removed. The truth really does'nt have too hurt.
------------- www.markbarrington.com
|
Posted By: sherrie215
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 6:28pm
|
It wasnt about the truth hurting Mark
There was alot of self promoting going in the thread and due to the fact that Amm is our girl the entire post had the potential to turn into a big ugly mess....which is probably why it was deleted but I cant speak for the Admin...just my opinion
------------- www.hairextensions101.com - www.hairextensions101.com
www.mybeautyaddiction.com - www.mybeautyaddiction.com
|
Posted By: toobz
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 6:46pm
I apologize if my reply seemed to aggressive, I don't want to upset the flow or create bad karma. But I have an obligation to my company's investment.So I just want to let people know ShrinkLinks are available to uncertified stylists as long as they are licensed.Our ShrinkTip hair and our certified version ShrinkLinks will only be available to our certified customers.This is mainly for industry standard control and client safety.Sometimes you have to invest in your profession I respect all hair stylists after all we know what it takes to become licensed and to keep up with advanced training.We do not believe in over saturation of the market so we do want to leave our certified products for those who take the time to be certified through our courses.
------------- www.markbarrington.com
|
Posted By: sherrie215
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 7:27pm
Mark are you aware that there are several states that do NOT require a license to do hair extensions as a profession? What about those people who are operating a legitimate business in there state? Will they be allowed to purchase or take your class?
------------- www.hairextensions101.com - www.hairextensions101.com
www.mybeautyaddiction.com - www.mybeautyaddiction.com
|
Posted By: smshands
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 7:39pm
|
How much will the uncertified shrinkies be?
|
Posted By: toobz
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 7:52pm
Hi sherrie215, Yes we are aware that most states don't require a state license. However we do. Reasons being mainly client safety and promotion of the professional industry.Now don't get me wrong I am not knocking the DYI's but we try to keep some integrity for the professional market.We have just made a recent decision to service the uncertified but licensed professional with our uncertified version of our product.Paul Mitchell Co. has recently gone through the same situation.Copying is the most sincere form of flattery however we are about absolute quality. Thank You All for understanding. P.S. Even our overseas customers are lincensed but not all are certified.
------------- www.markbarrington.com
|
Posted By: toobz
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 7:54pm
Hi smshands, They will be very close if not a better price. We will notify on pricing. Thanks for understanding
------------- www.markbarrington.com
|
Posted By: Karen Shelton
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 8:09pm
|
The reason the thread was deleted was that we received 5 complaints in less than one hour specifically directed at the blatant advertising that was included in two of the original posts. I was asked to ban one of the people advertising but decided to let it go for now to see if we can try this topic again because AMM is very near and dear to all of us here.
There is a very fine line here on this board and to be honest, to try and maintain fair boundaries, we created a Salon Directory for anyone that wanted to aggressively advertise their services. The cost of the directory is competitive with other similar directories and basically covers our costs.
Any of you that maintain a salon or have a business understand that you have to pay to run that business. Of course you might be a little upset if someone posted their ads with their phone numbers or web site on the outside of your building where you were paying rent and running a respectible hair extension business.
We are in the same boat here. I have always strived to provide a community that was a fun, friendly and informative place to be. I have resisted charging for anything on the site, other than in our store. Recently the cost of hosting the site has gone wild and so we sell Goggle ads and other advertising to help keep the site free.
However, when people use the boards for "free advertising" it is definitely a problem. Not only from the ethical sense but once someone starts there are flocks of others behind them. :-)
Ironically, when someone posts advertising on this board and it is removed, someone from HB.com contacts the advertiser asking if they would like to advertise in the Salon directory or on the site. Of course none of you will be surprised to know that not one of the people that have ever posted their advertising illegally here has ever agreed to be listed in the directory. Nor have they agreed to buy banner ads or similar.
In one case, I personally called a woman in Atlanta who posted a series of 20 ads over a three day period. She screamed at me on the phone and then hung up on me and said "the Internet is free for everyone". That gave us all a good laugh.
But I digress....................
As a result of all this and the fact that we try to be fair to all who visit here....there is zero tolerance on any attempts for anyone to cross the line. The majority of the people here do an excellent job of discussing their business within reason and appropriately. And I really appreciate that very much. So thank you all.
When the line is breached...the HB Admin Team will delete it immediately.
That's just business. You all understand that I am sure.
And by the way....it has been a rough couple of days here with various attacks on long term valued members so the Admin team is a little quick on the delete fingers. I apologize for any inconvenience in advance and thank you all for your posts and participation.
------------- That which doesn't kill you makes you stronger or drives you totally insane. :-)
|
Posted By: sherrie215
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 8:13pm
hmmmm....guess I just need to start doing some research! Since you choose to not sell to the DIYer or unlicensed extensionists ( and thats fine, its a business decision) then you shouldnt have a problem with me purchasing my own heat shrink tubing...correct?
------------- www.hairextensions101.com - www.hairextensions101.com
www.mybeautyaddiction.com - www.mybeautyaddiction.com
|
Posted By: toobz
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 9:44pm
Dear Karen, Forgive me for not understanding your policies prior to replying to this topic.This is a very confusing topic I understand and I was just trying to give correct info on ShrinkLinks. Because shrinkies product is in direct violation of U.S. Patent laws and we are trying to inform the professional and consumer market the difference and why it really does matter.But out of respect for you as a pro and a business person we both know what an effort it takes.So I will not abuse your forum.I admire you for all your work this is a valuable tool for all. I will also look into advertising on your sight can you give any stats and pricing. Thanks, Mark Barrington / AKA-toobz
------------- www.markbarrington.com
|
Posted By: Aphrodite
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 9:52pm
|
Mark -
What about all the other companies out there who call there products "shrinkies"? Are they in violation of US patent laws too?
-------------
|
Posted By: sherrie215
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 9:54pm
I for one have always been very well aware of the Shrinklinks and Shrinkies being two completely different products.
------------- www.hairextensions101.com - www.hairextensions101.com
www.mybeautyaddiction.com - www.mybeautyaddiction.com
|
Posted By: Aphrodite
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 9:59pm
I certainly see the potential confusion that they are "all the same"....however, there are literally 10 or so (probably many more) companies out there offering "shrinkies" or "shrink tubes", or shrink links" etc.....how can they all be violating patent law? There must be a certain criterion that they are meeting to be "different enough"....interesting.....
-------------
|
Posted By: Aphrodite
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 10:02pm
I wonder if changing the name to "formerly-known-as-shrinkies" (remember Prince?) would be enough to get around the legalities....I know, Mark, you do not find that funny.....
-------------
|
Posted By: sherrie215
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 10:05pm
I dont know what MB shrink tubes are made of, I assume some sort of medical grade tubing or electrical tubing. But the rest of the shrink tubes from these other companies are simply medical or electrical shrink tubing. So how can it be a crime to buy it and sell it?
------------- www.hairextensions101.com - www.hairextensions101.com
www.mybeautyaddiction.com - www.mybeautyaddiction.com
|
Posted By: toobz
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 10:08pm
Yes Aphrodite any body selling or profiting in general on any hair attachment with shrink tubing of any sort. And we are on a very agressive campaign against all violaters sooner or later.When the patent runs out then it can be a literal free for all . But until then if you want to be legal and profiting by this product you must purchase through us or work out patent use licensing.That's the law.We are not meanies we just always do the right thing and respect all patent,trademark and copyright laws.Let alone the investment.
------------- www.markbarrington.com
|
Posted By: sherrie215
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 10:13pm
|
ouchie ouchie...leave it alone
------------- www.hairextensions101.com - www.hairextensions101.com
www.mybeautyaddiction.com - www.mybeautyaddiction.com
|
Posted By: Aphrodite
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 10:19pm
|
Interesting. Honestly though Mark, I am a bit confused by your assuming that by only selling to licensed stylists that you are maintaining some sort of integrity to the application etc. etc. MOST stylists do not know how to do extensions. I would think that an alternate way to attempt to ensure consistency and quality would be to require the purchaser to have trained with your company, and passed some sort of proficiency.
In the past, I have purchased your ShrinkLinks indirectly through a "licensed" stylist that is willing to order them or me. My point being, there are ways around everything. "Licensing" assures you of nothing if your goal is to make sure those using your product know what they are doing. I was very pleased with them, however, there are similar shrinkies out there that are just as good and cost much less so I do not use yours anymore.
-------------
|
Posted By: Jenny_RR
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 10:20pm
Ah...the eternal question: "Does a shrinklink by any other name smell as sweet?"
Fact: Whether they're marketed as shrinkies, shrinklinks, shink-a-doos,
or shrink-a-roonies, adhesive-lined tubing--what ShrinkLinks
essentially are--is fundamentally an inexpensive, widely available
hardware-store product that can't be removed from the shelves. And its
use as a hardware product far predates its use as a hair one.
This entire debate, and what sounds like a lot of intimidation frankly
(I do *not* know the specifics here but am basing my observations on
this threads and similar ones I've observed for more than a year now),
seems unfortunate. If MB does not intend to distribute to DIYers, which
is certainly his prerogative, I can't understand why he'd object to
others marketing shrink tubing for at-home use. If the DIYers don't get
it from those souces, they'll just find others, believe me.
Also, MB might want to remember that the popularity of shrink tubing in
general has skyrocketed over the past year and a half as a direct
result of the information and tutorials DIYers have posted on these
very boards. Potential clients who might've been skeptical about the
concept have seen these results and embraced the idea of shrink
tubing--something that can only benefit his company (many people come
here for info. but don't intend to DIY it).
Simply put, they see the gorgeous results DIYers like AMM, Sherrie, and
others post, and they want a similar method done by a professional.
Where do they turn? In many cases, MB. Not a bad form of advertising,
now is it? Just search these boards, and see how many times your
company name or initials have been cited. Now, that's some priceless
free advertising! (This is not to mention that the trends and results
posted here are picked up by other sites all over the Internet--so
there's serious viralocity beyond what you're even seeing here.)
Now, will MB snag every potential shrink-tube client on the planet if
Doc Locks and shrinkies.net sell them too? Well, no. I suppose he
won't. But when there are so many other methods to choose from--fusion,
pinch, heat-seals, Pro-tac, etc.--I think he'd be wise to embrace
anyone who's keeping the shrink-tubing method front and center. In the
world of extensions, methods go in and out of vogue so quickly....
And personally, I'd never even heard of MB or shrinklinks until the
DIYers started posting about it here. Only then did I learn of MB, and
I'm not exactly an extensions newbie (as evidenced by my voluminous
posting here). So, if anything, the DIY crew has only increased MB's
branding.
Remember, business does not have to be a zero-sum game. It *is* possible for everyone to benefit.
xoxox
------------- http://www.beautyaddictmag.com - www.beautyaddictmag.com
|
Posted By: toobz
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 10:25pm
Anybody has the right to use anything and apply it yourself patented or not. That is not what is in dispute here. It's other companies selling for profiteering.And when this happens we have absolute right to issue complaints to these companies.The law allows any individual to use anything they choose but strictly for there own personal use.In this case though you always run risk when using a product not designed for this use you take your own chances.There is something to say for research and developement of any product used in the professional beauty industry.That's why it pays to use the original and the only patented product of its kind since 1991. That's a long time in the business of hair extension manufacturing."old school,meets new school"
------------- www.markbarrington.com
|
Posted By: sherrie215
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 10:25pm
life wouldnt be very good if we only had ONE brand of everything to choose from, no options, no choices....almost seems like dictatorship! Everything that you can possibly think of in this world, there is another product that is similar or the same, just a different name. So what is the big deal with shrink tubing used for extensions!
------------- www.hairextensions101.com - www.hairextensions101.com
www.mybeautyaddiction.com - www.mybeautyaddiction.com
|
Posted By: sherrie215
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 10:27pm
Amen to JENNY.....good to have you here girl!
------------- www.hairextensions101.com - www.hairextensions101.com
www.mybeautyaddiction.com - www.mybeautyaddiction.com
|
Posted By: Aphrodite
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 10:31pm
Mark - I do understand what you are saying. You are protecting your patent, and take issue to those profiting from a name you have protected. I guess I am just glad it is not so easy for you to block others because I am not a 'licensed' stylist but I am a very "professional" extensionist and like working with "shrinkies". If you had it your way, I would not have access to them....seems you could be much more profitable if you were willing to sell to folks like me...
-------------
|
Posted By: Jenny_RR
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 10:36pm
toobz wrote:
When this happens we have absolute right to issue complaints to these companies. |
Regardless of whether you have the right or not, it may not be wise to
assume an exclusionary position (given all of the advantages I
exhaustively cited, and the fact that your patent will eventually run
out anyway). Will you temporarily disable some vendors? Yes, you will.
Will that benefit you in the long term? Personally, I don't think it
will at all.
But hey, if you still think it's wise, fair enough. It ain't my company.
xoxox
------------- http://www.beautyaddictmag.com - www.beautyaddictmag.com
|
Posted By: sherrie215
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 10:38pm
|
Great Lenghts is patented...so why is it we have so many other brands of fusion bonding?
I guess I just dont get this whole patent issue. MB is the only thing I have EVER seen, that claims that no one else can sell a similar product. Ive never in my life walked into a store to buy a specific product, intended for a specific use and only had ONE brand to choose from.
------------- www.hairextensions101.com - www.hairextensions101.com
www.mybeautyaddiction.com - www.mybeautyaddiction.com
|
Posted By: Longhairdreams
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 10:48pm
Well said what you posted earlier Jenny . I really dont see the big deal about others offering their own shrinks.Whenever anyone who knows anything about shrinks thinks of the best their is out their MB"s shrinklinks come to mind.They always get rave reviews.I dont believe that any business is being lost over others selling it.Plus from what little I know about patents and legalities I dont think you can sue or make someone stop selling them unless they actually selling by the same name as your product.
-------------
|
Posted By: toobz
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 10:50pm
If these companies want to sell we will work out wholesale pricing and work out details I never said We would not sell to these companies they just need to purchase through us and also this dispute has never been over the name shrinkies. Our name ShrinkLink is a trademark and shrinkies is not in violation of trademark infringement.Our process is patented so why should knock off products be able to profit without us receiving our due licensing fees.
------------- www.markbarrington.com
|
Posted By: sherrie215
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 10:55pm
|
Ahhh so you want to be the ONLY one in the market...to monopolize and control the market!
So if its the process that is patented, then I or anyone else should be able to sell shrink tubing, so long as we dont advertise it for that purpose...correct?
------------- www.hairextensions101.com - www.hairextensions101.com
www.mybeautyaddiction.com - www.mybeautyaddiction.com
|
Posted By: toobz
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 10:59pm
INCORRECT !
------------- www.markbarrington.com
|
Posted By: sherrie215
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:00pm
LOL...so if someone sells heat shrink tubing its in violation of your patent?
------------- www.hairextensions101.com - www.hairextensions101.com
www.mybeautyaddiction.com - www.mybeautyaddiction.com
|
Posted By: saucyblossom
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:01pm
|
So, question.... Are you saying that shrinklinks are totally different than the adhesive lined tubing sold for electronics? And if so, than why can't the common electronics product be sold for the purpose of hair extension for those who chose to use it or sell it for that purpose?
------------- Early years are learning years, make them count!
|
Posted By: Jenny_RR
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:02pm
toobz wrote:
Why should knock off products be able to profit without us receiving our due licensing fees?
|
Because they continue to increase your branding, boost your
reputuation, provide invaluable free advertising, and keep the method
in the forefront of consumers' minds. (And let's face it, you "knocked
off" a hardware product in the first place. Nothing in this world is
truly "original.")
In my mind, you seem to underestimate the power of viral Web marketing
and Internet good will. Remember, extensions is a primarily young and
fickle market that's always looking for the next big thing. Those who
only have $50 to spend on their hair will only have $50, period; they
won't use MB regardless of whether shrink tubing is marketed for hair
use or not.
Again, I would urge you to weigh the long-term benefits against the short-term gains as you make your business decisions.
With that, I'm done.
xoxox
------------- http://www.beautyaddictmag.com - www.beautyaddictmag.com
|
Posted By: toobz
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:08pm
If any of these companies want to sell to the end user that is not licensed that is their decision. But they need to buy wholesale through us and then it's a win win situation.It can be easy.And good for all who LOVE hair. And those who choose it for a profession.Or the DIYs.Like I say once these other companies buy from M B Concepts, inc. they can sell to whom ever.Period.I guarantee these ShrinkLinks to be of the very best quality.Again it's a win,win situation.
------------- www.markbarrington.com
|
Posted By: gsmilie
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:09pm
|
Wholly crapola, I don't read my emails for less than 24 hours and all chaos breaks out!!!
|
Posted By: sherrie215
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:12pm
You didnt answer my question Mark. If I sell shrink tubing...not advertising as a hair extension product do you consider that a violation of your patent? You told me I was INCORRECT when I mentioned it...just interested in your opinion!
------------- www.hairextensions101.com - www.hairextensions101.com
www.mybeautyaddiction.com - www.mybeautyaddiction.com
|
Posted By: toobz
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:16pm
I will have to consult with our legal team to answer that question honestly and absoluty. Thanks sherrie215
------------- www.markbarrington.com
|
Posted By: sherrie215
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:19pm
Ok Mark! Thanks for that answer!
------------- www.hairextensions101.com - www.hairextensions101.com
www.mybeautyaddiction.com - www.mybeautyaddiction.com
|
Posted By: Jenny_RR
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:21pm
toobz wrote:
If any of these companies want to sell to the end user
that is not licensed that is their decision. But they need to buy
wholesale through us. |
Oh, man...just when I think I'm out, they *drag* me back in!
So, MB, essentially what you're saying here is that you're not actually
concerned about "preserving the integrity of the professional market"
by distributing only to licensed stylists for safety reasons (which is
what you intimated before). Redistribution to DIY is fine, just as long
as you get your cut?
Question: When you decided to "repurpose" a hardware product as a hair
one, didn't you think there was some possibility that others would also
get hip to the idea and say, "Gee--I can buy a hardware product and use
it in my hair, too!"
I'm just waiting for some hair goddess to launch a site selling shrink
tubing to *wink, wink* conceal the electrical cords behind their
furniture. You know, pics of hot Rapunzels lounging on couches and
ottomans. Boo-ya!
Think anyone's patented the use of olive oil in hair yet? Because if
not, I'm all over that! Yeah, you can buy it at the supermarket, but if
anyone tries to sell some extra-virgin in a hair product, I'm there,
baby!
------------- http://www.beautyaddictmag.com - www.beautyaddictmag.com
|
Posted By: Aphrodite
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:24pm
|
Sherrie - Of course you could...it is the name and its "likeness" he is attempting to protect...
I was at Home Depot the other day and found "shrink" tubing in the electrical department that works just fine when cut down and used with hair...THAT IS ALL IT IS!!!!!!!!! I call it "Hair bond stuff", and I am in no violation of any patent!!!!!!
-------------
|
Posted By: smshands28
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:27pm
|
I hope I unnderstand what Mark is saying. It is not the name, it is the process that is that is patented. It is kind of like Thomas Edison and the light bulb. He invented it put eventually anyone can make them. Or Ben Franklin and eye glasses, or levis and dungerees, etc.
I feel sorry for the DIYers!!!! You are the people I have learned the most from!!! I am a stylist and the majority of experienced stylist wouldn't give me near of the warm reception you guys have. Long before I was a stylist, I was a kitchen chemist. I learned way more that way than I ever did in school!
I also understand the business aspect of it I had a stylist wanting to come to work for me. Everything was a go and she had started moving her equipment in to my salon. She finally got the balls to ask me "So, when are you going to teach me how to do extensions. When are you going to order my kit?" I explained to her that I wasn't going to teach her. I am the only stylist in a 50 mile radius doing strand by strand extensions and I'll be damned if I move competition in the chair next to mine!!!! She threw a fit! That was it for her! She was just in it to get my knowledge.
I guess he is saying, if you want to apply adhesive lined heat shrink tubing in a hair extention process, get your supplies from a hardware store, not a person or business in the market selling "Shrink Tubes for Hair Extensions".
I hope this all works out. I can see it from everyone's perspective and I am so sorry crap like this happens.
Good Luck!
|
Posted By: saucyblossom
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:27pm
|
Question #2..
Toobz, are you aware that there are several sources of adhesive lined shrink tubing, some pretty big ones too, like the 3M company, and others that sell the product wholesale?
It's not that hard to get the stuff.......I am still wondering if that is a entirely different product...or not????
------------- Early years are learning years, make them count!
|
Posted By: sherrie215
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:29pm
|
Aphrodite if you read his posts in regards to my questions, he is saying that the process of using shrink tubing to attach hair extensions is what is patented, so anyone that sells the tubing or markets the product for extensions is in violation of his patent. So when I asked if I could sell it and NOT advertise it as for use as a hair extension product he said...INCORRECT. According to MB, its not the likeness of the name...its the process
------------- www.hairextensions101.com - www.hairextensions101.com
www.mybeautyaddiction.com - www.mybeautyaddiction.com
|
Posted By: Jenny_RR
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:34pm
So I could patent cucumbers for puffy eyes...
aloe for skin...
those little plastic baggies for makeup transport...
cotton swabs for makeup application...
mineral oil for makeup removal...
fabric softener for synth hair...
hemorroid cream for undereye circles (granted, it's gross, but a potential goldmine!).
I'm rich, bee-atch!
------------- http://www.beautyaddictmag.com - www.beautyaddictmag.com
|
Posted By: saucyblossom
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:35pm
I think I'm getting it now.... whatever... we'll just have to start an underground for adhesive lined shrink tubing........thinking along the lines of bath tub gin and speak easy's for DIY hair extenioners.
------------- Early years are learning years, make them count!
|
Posted By: Aphrodite
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:35pm
|
I understand that is what he is saying.....I just don't buy it. Can I patent selling "bag balm" for use on dry skin? It was made for something else but many people use it for dry skin or cuts etc...gosh, I guess I'll just PATENT THAT!!!!
I would love to read the small print of his patent and what it pertains to...I can see the "likeness" of "shrinkies" being an issue, but the process...COME ON!!!!!
-------------
|
Posted By: Aphrodite
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:36pm
Jenny - EXACTLY what I am saying.....
-------------
|
Posted By: amm
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:36pm
Posted By: Aphrodite
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:39pm
AMM - I am sorry what has happened to you but please......
-------------
|
Posted By: sherrie215
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:40pm
|
I also noticed something in smshands post that I think according to MB's previous post that he may has issue with.
smshands wrote:
I guess he is saying, if you want to apply adhesive lined heat shrink tubing in a hair extention process, get your supplies from a hardware store, not a person or business in the market selling "Shrink Tubes for Hair Extensions".
So according to his previous posts, he says anyone can put anything in there own hair, and for there own personal use. So I assume he would have an issue if a stylist was going to the hardware store and buying shrink tubing to put into a clients hair for profit!
Please correct me if I am wrong Mark.
------------- www.hairextensions101.com - www.hairextensions101.com
www.mybeautyaddiction.com - www.mybeautyaddiction.com
|
Posted By: amm
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:43pm
First, in regard to my site and products being gone, many of you already know that back in December I became contractually obligated to something completely non-hair related and I have no spare time anymore. Products get sold, some I have restocked, some I haven't. I'm addressing some way to keep doing it all and I have no workable solution as of yet.
Second, there's been a lot of legalities already addressed last year between attorneys behind-the-scenes in regard to shrinkies. I'd like to add as well that none of that was between myself and Mr. Barrington, his company or products. What I know of this situation is what I have read right here along with you guys.
Let me say that I do respect the concept of patenting an idea/invention and keeping tight control over the product. Choosing who you certify and allow to use the product should be commended. Let's face it, if this was for the money, the shrinklinks would have been out in the market before China saturated the states with it. However, now that something's going to come out to the general public without control, there may be some question as to level of caring vs profit. I'm just sayin'.
That said, using the name "shrinkies" or "heat shrink tubing" in regard to hair is neither a violation of any registered trademark or patent. Providing heat shrink tubing does not fall into that realm either as the process for application is left up to the individual and has never been trained for profit. (Not by me anyway and I have no control over others who take it upon themselves to do). Surely, heat shrink tubing has been applied to the plugs of "thermosetting adhesive" coated hair strands as it has been applied to non-adhesive strands as it's been applied to bulk as it's been applied to pinchbraids as it's been applied to wefts, etc. There can't be general language in a patent process that states "this covers every known way of using generic tubing on any type of hair extension method." If one wants to patent every process and method, those methods for patent must be purchased. That's how fusion methods multiply with prior patents - something is changed or improved upon and a new patent emerges. That's how we wind up with multiple selections of products and generic versions and department store brands that not only create a like brand but even mimic design labels (which is a copyright but that's another topic). These examples are not exhaustive and can be sited over and over.
Now, I can see where the methods and procedure of attachment for monetary gain which is employed by individuals or salons may be a bone of contention. That may be something that has to be decided in the legal forum. But that has nothing to do with me. I've never gained profit over "attachment" process methods.
Just to inject some real fear into this -- I have seen this in a few places, salons/and or private extensionists profiting from using the name "shrinklinks" to promote a service when in fact they have neither been certified in or use Concept Inc.'s tubing and method. Further, using any heat shrink tubing that is not shrinklinks and promoting that to attract customers for personal profit
And I agree, it can be pretty confusing when the world market is saturated with a product name like shrinkies and is moving toward a name already trademarked. For example:
http://www.ecplaza.net/tradeleads/seller/2498291/100human_ha ir_wig_hairpiece_fusion_iron_hair_extension_ironkit_glue_pot _glue_gun_shrinklink.html
You can see China is now using the terminology "shrinklinks." One wonders how to stem the flow.
------------- http://shrinkies.net - Extension Supplies & Virgin Brazilian Hair
|
Posted By: Jenny_RR
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:44pm
Sher, I think he's saying that any for-profit installation or
distribution of shrink tubing in or for hair is fine, as long as he
gets a cut. What happens for free is beyond his domain.
xoxox
------------- http://www.beautyaddictmag.com - www.beautyaddictmag.com
|
Posted By: sherrie215
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:50pm
|
what I understand is..so long as someone is making money, and putting hardware store shrink tubing in someones hair it would be a violation of his patent. If Im using it for my own person use its fine!
------------- www.hairextensions101.com - www.hairextensions101.com
www.mybeautyaddiction.com - www.mybeautyaddiction.com
|
Posted By: Jenny_RR
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:51pm
amm wrote:
That said, using the name "shrinkies" or "heat shrink
tubing" in regard to hair is neither a violation of any registered
trademark or patent.
|
OK, now I'm totally confused. If it's not in violation, then what's the
issue here? Didn't MB say the distribution and/or application of shrink
tubing in hair (by any name) is in violation of his patent, unless he
gets a cut?
So confused, lol!
xoxox
------------- http://www.beautyaddictmag.com - www.beautyaddictmag.com
|
Posted By: sherrie215
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:55pm
I think the whole thing is a BLUFF....and trying to use BULLY tactics and intimidate and scare people into not using anything other than HIS process
------------- www.hairextensions101.com - www.hairextensions101.com
www.mybeautyaddiction.com - www.mybeautyaddiction.com
|
Posted By: Kalika
Date Posted: March 05 2006 at 11:59pm
|
Oh blah, fine I'll say it.
Mark, stop being an ass.
There.
Sheesh, thats as asanine as patenting weaving thread.
|
Posted By: Jenny_RR
Date Posted: March 06 2006 at 12:07am
You got to know when to hold ’em, know when to fold ’em,
Know when to walk away and know when to run.
You never count your money when you’re sittin’ at the table.
There’ll be time enough for countin’ when the dealin’s done.
------------- http://www.beautyaddictmag.com - www.beautyaddictmag.com
|
Posted By: gsmilie
Date Posted: March 06 2006 at 12:07am
Posted By: amm
Date Posted: March 06 2006 at 12:07am
Jenny_RR wrote:
amm wrote:
That said, using the name "shrinkies" or "heat shrink
tubing" in regard to hair is neither a violation of any registered
trademark or patent. |
OK, now I'm totally confused. If it's not in violation, then what's the
issue here? Didn't MB say the distribution and/or application of shrink
tubing in hair (by any name) is in violation of his patent, unless he
gets a cut?
So confused, lol!
xoxox
|
I only know about all this based on the early '05 incident with Dr. Locs and some other legal issues (not related whatsoever to Barrington)...
Shrinklinks is a trademark. You cannot use that to profit when you are selling a service or items that are not the trademarked product.
The patent is a process and method. Tubing vendors do not profit off a process - it's the salons and people who use the process for monetary gain or teach Barrington's patented process for their own profit. Anyone can go out and buy shrink tubing off the shelves - that is not the issue (edit: it seems mistakenly to be, though).
When you make money off the method Barrington patended, you are in violation.
Here's the patent and it's a good thing to ask yourself if you're doing this and making money: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5,107,867.WKU.&OS=PN/5,107,867&RS=PN/5,107,867 - http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=H ITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5,1 07,867.WKU.&OS=PN/5,107,867&RS=PN/5,107,867
------------- http://shrinkies.net - Extension Supplies & Virgin Brazilian Hair
|
Posted By: Jenny_RR
Date Posted: March 06 2006 at 12:12am
So what if the "process" was altered slightly? Like MB uses a
particular kind of hair and removal formula, but how about those who
use something different and call it a "shrinkie" (as opposed to
shrinklinks application). Are they in violation?
------------- http://www.beautyaddictmag.com - www.beautyaddictmag.com
|
Posted By: Jenny_RR
Date Posted: March 06 2006 at 12:15am
OK, read it. When does this thing expire. Anyone know?
xoxox
------------- http://www.beautyaddictmag.com - www.beautyaddictmag.com
|
Posted By: Aphrodite
Date Posted: March 06 2006 at 12:21am
|
I read the patent...thanks, AMM...If this is really the case....I guess it is on to silicone- lined micro-rings and fusion installs!!! I CANNOT see how this is beneficial to Mark Barrington in any way, shape, or form...
If he enforces this, we will simply go onto other methods....
As a side, AMM, I do use MB SHRINK LINKS sometimes so I am in NO VIOLATION of anything...you presume far too much....
-------------
|
Posted By: TanglesRC
Date Posted: March 06 2006 at 1:01am
|
i can understand both sides of the spectrum on this whole issue.
Its prob the same way hairlocs feels about their patent. now eveyone sells, links, locs, shells, tubes, etc. they all do the same thing, even look the same, and yet, everyone is profiting from someone elses ideas. Personally, i would take it as a compliment and let it go, you could spend your whole life sueing eveyone or spend your life making SURE your the best and so is your product.
For Mark- i agree stylist should be certified in what ever method they plan to do, it makes for more credibility and professionalism. There are 6 stylist in my salon certified and their certificiates are proudly displayed in salon and we are currently the top extension salon in our area.
------------- Bringing beauty, one head at a time...
|
|