Print Page | Close Window

Linda Evangelista...Long no more

Printed From: HairBoutique.com
Category: Beautiful People, Beautiful Hair
Forum Name: Celebrity Hair Talk
Forum Description: The hair trials and tribulations of Celebrities
URL: https://talk.hairboutique.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=41845
Printed Date: January 01 2026 at 12:49am


Topic: Linda Evangelista...Long no more
Posted By: rardman
Subject: Linda Evangelista...Long no more
Date Posted: March 30 2006 at 5:56pm

Too bad, imo. Bland mid length bob. I like her really long, or really short. This is way too "soccer mom" for me.

Obligatory WI link...

  http://www.wireimage.com/GalleryListing.asp?navtyp=SRH&logsrch=1 - http://www.wireimage.com/GalleryListing.asp?navtyp=SRH&l ogsrch=1




Replies:
Posted By: HAWG
Date Posted: March 30 2006 at 6:36pm
I agree; it seems to be in that "in between" stage where it touches the shoulders sometimes, and sometimes it doesn't.  I loved her short looks.

-------------
HAWG


Posted By: fatmoogas
Date Posted: March 30 2006 at 6:56pm

A rather misleading title, Rardman. "Long no more", suggests short--and it is far from that!

Personally, I think it's not bad. The condition seems quite good and another couple of inches would make it sleek and interesting.



Posted By: Mike46019
Date Posted: March 31 2006 at 7:53am
I agree with fatmoogas on this one she would great with it a bit longer. I hope she does.

-------------
Few men are killed by the bayonet;many are scared by it.Bayonets should be fixed when the fire fight starts.General George Patton Jr.,War As I Knew It,1947.


Posted By: rardman
Date Posted: March 31 2006 at 10:45am
Originally posted by fatmoogas fatmoogas wrote:

A rather misleading title, Rardman. "Long no more", suggests short--and it is far from that!

Personally, I think it's not bad. The condition seems quite good and another couple of inches would make it sleek and interesting.

I totally disagree. I don't think it was misleading at all.."Long no more", because, ummm, it isn't! Her hair was mid-back length before this cut.Her hair now isn't even shoulder length. It falls between chin and shoulder length. Imo, far closer to a short look, than a long one. Mid-length, at best.

That being said I didn't even call it "short". I said it was "long no more". 

I do agree with your observation that a few more inches would make it interesting, but I guess she didn't agree with us, since she just adopted this "style".



Posted By: Hellfrozeover
Date Posted: April 01 2006 at 6:48am

Yeah I'd say anything above shoulder length is short.

Fatmoogas: You posted about Shakira's hair being short when it was about bsl.



-------------


Posted By: fatmoogas
Date Posted: April 01 2006 at 7:42am

Everything is relative. One person's "longish" is another person's "shortish." There are no hard and fast rules.

And oh what a long memory you have Grandma.



Posted By: Hellfrozeover
Date Posted: April 02 2006 at 4:24am
Originally posted by fatmoogas fatmoogas wrote:

And oh what a long memory you have Grandma.

All the better to haunt you with!

 



-------------



Print Page | Close Window