Mary Christmas
Printed From: HairBoutique.com
Category: Beautiful People, Beautiful Hair
Forum Name: Celebrity Hair Talk
Forum Description: The hair trials and tribulations of Celebrities
URL: https://talk.hairboutique.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=58481
Printed Date: December 29 2025 at 10:00pm
Topic: Mary Christmas
Posted By: Kramer
Subject: Mary Christmas
Date Posted: December 25 2007 at 9:05am
|
Now, before you think I lost my spelling ability or am way off topic, I present the story of Mary Christmas and how her hair looked on her wedding day. Mary has become somewhat of a celebrity because of her name, so she belongs here.
http://deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,695238208,00.html - http://deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,695238208,00.html
That being said, Merry Christmas to all.
Kramer
|
Replies:
Posted By: Mad Gasser
Date Posted: December 26 2007 at 4:14pm
| She's not a celebrity, she's a attentionabrity. |
Posted By: ssjockey
Date Posted: December 26 2007 at 6:31pm
|
Kramer, you have hit a new high in obscurity. Just because you can find something out about somebody on the internet doesn't make them a celebrity or a personality.
I'm going to create the Kramer Scale of Obscurity
"A Kramer"-
 - not relatively known, but famous in their own right. Think porn actresses or anyone with the last name Kardassian."Kramer Squared" -
- is even less known, think local TV personalities in South America or Europe or minor Bollywood Actresses who have long hair."Kramer Cubed" -
- is SO obscure that even Fatmoogas hasn't even heard of the person. Think Mary Christmas. These are people who are only found through 8 to 10 hours a day of internet searching.Yeah, I'm ribbing Kramer here, but seriously, are you just trying to keep your post count up?
|
Posted By: arch94
Date Posted: December 26 2007 at 7:04pm
|
SSJockey rocks!
I would have considered it newsworthy had she gotten a newlywed chop...but that's just me ;)
------------- We all know what opinions are like...and I've got both! |
Posted By: Kramer
Date Posted: December 26 2007 at 11:41pm
Actually, I just wanted to wish everyone Merry Christmas and couldn't do it without being off topic.
 I guess I could have gone here as well:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Christmas - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Christmas
but I didn't have any pictures of her readily at my disposal. Plus I think she's dead.
|
ssjockey wrote:Posted By: ssjockey
Date Posted: December 27 2007 at 11:03am
The Wikipedia entry is all well and good, but if you look at the original article you posted, the woman Mary Christmas is not the Mary Christmas of the wikipedia article. Nice try though.
|
Posted By: Kramer
Date Posted: December 27 2007 at 9:02pm
|
You don't have to try very hard to be a jerk, do you? No one ever said the Mary Christmases were the same. No one. Not me. Not you. No one.
In fact, this article says there are 90 people named "Mary Christmas" in the United States alone. I named a couple of the more famous ones.
To quote you, "Nice try, though."
And, Arch, if that's how you get your "rocks" off, so be it.
|
Posted By: ssjockey
Date Posted: December 27 2007 at 9:19pm
|
Sorry if I assumed that your second post was a validation of your first post. That seemed to be what you were going after.
It's the internet, don't take it so personally! I don't. Kramer, I think you are a nice guy who goes a bit overboard on the kind of posts you put here. It amazes me that you would post a wedding notice about some random girl with a funny name under the "celebrity" board! I was just trying to poke a little fun!
Have a happy new year!
|