Celebrity Hair Talk - Jenna Elfman

Print Page | Close Window

Jenna Elfman

Printed From: HairBoutique.com
Category: Beautiful People, Beautiful Hair
Forum Name: Celebrity Hair Talk
Forum Description: The hair trials and tribulations of Celebrities
URL: https://talk.hairboutique.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=59736
Printed Date: December 29 2025 at 12:32am

Topic: Jenna Elfman

Posted By: Kramer
Subject: Jenna Elfman
Date Posted: March 17 2008 at 3:11am

Once upon a time, there was an actress named Jenna Elfman who let her hair grow into a longer beautiful style, even as she was very pregnant. This made some of her fans very happy.

http://img151.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jeplummagsummer07b2xz0.jpg">

http://img151.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jeplummagsummer07c2bjd1.jpg">

http://img151.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jeplummagsummer07d2ne9.jpg">

http://img151.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jeplummagsummer07e2eb9.jpg">

http://img151.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jeplummagsummer07f2ny8.jpg">

http://img151.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jeplummagsummer07g2id8.jpg">

http://img151.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jeplummagsummer07jmergelt2.jpg">

Then one day, Jenna gave birth to a baby.

Not long after that, Jenna got her hair cut, disappointing her fans who hoped she would keep her hair long, but perhaps satisfying her need for a new, simpler, albeit more matronly style, especially with baby in tow.

http://img174.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jemercedesbenzfashionwejv9.jpg">

http://img174.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jemercedesbenzfashionweja5.jpg">

http://img80.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jemercedesbenzfashionweof3.jpg">

http://img80.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jemercedesbenzfashionweks1.jpg">

http://img225.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jemercedesbenzfashionweoy5.jpg">

http://img225.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jemercedesbenzfashionwepu3.jpg">

http://img410.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jemercedesbenzfashionwehv8.jpg">

http://img410.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jemercedesbenzfashionweje8.jpg">

http://img410.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jemercedesbenzfashionwezw3.jpg">

One possible moral of the story: Be happy with what you have while you have it, for it may be gone tomorrow.

And the next time someone claims that women with long hair don't get their hair cut short after having a baby, please remind them of the Jenna Elfman story.

The end.

And if you want to know more about that creature that entered her life and led to her haircut, it's here: http://www.eonline.com/news/article/index.jsp?uuid=943a8a60-6474-4265-abd7-8fee67a20cce - http://www.eonline.com/news/article/index.jsp?uuid=943a8a60-6474-4265-abd7-8fee67a20cce

Replies:

Posted By: Hal
Date Posted: March 17 2008 at 7:21am

Wow... I love it and hope more celebs get knocked up!!!!!!!!

Thats one sexy mommy cut!!!!

Posted By: Curlyfan
Date Posted: March 17 2008 at 10:24am

Still, I wonder why, if she wanted a simpler style because she became a mommy, she chose long bangs that she'll need to push or swing to the side and out of her eyes approximately every 3.5 seconds...

-------------
Your hair is your best accessory; wear it with STYLE!

Posted By: Hal
Date Posted: March 17 2008 at 12:18pm

Who said she wanted a simplier styole because she was a mommy? Maybe she wanted a sexier one?

Posted By: Jared
Date Posted: March 17 2008 at 12:19pm

This is very dissapointing but, it doesn't suprise me. I guess she thought she had to follow the old trend of getting your hair cut after having a baby. And she sure did hack it off.

Posted By: conrad
Date Posted: March 17 2008 at 12:30pm

How about she was tired of blow drying her hair for an hour and wanted to play with her child instead, so she cut it into a sexy style. Then she realized that it doesnt take anywhere near as long to get ready to go anywhere. I for one think that her hair cut is really chic and great looking.

Posted By: fatmoogas
Date Posted: March 17 2008 at 1:26pm

Better than the style she had in Dharma and Greg.

Posted By: arch94
Date Posted: March 17 2008 at 7:04pm

I just love a happy ending! Can you please tell me another story?

Matronly...you guys crack me up!

She's gorgeous. It's called the mommy chop, not to be confused with the newlywed chop. Google either term, and you'd be amazed!

I think she looks great either way, but does have hot edginess to her now. I think she just wanted a change...and I'm glad she went for it.

My two cents.

-------------
We all know what opinions are like...and I've got both!

Posted By: ssjockey
Date Posted: March 17 2008 at 7:07pm

To me, she's always been more of a short-haired girl. Some actresses get a short cut, but return to long hair, usually the short cut is at the start of a new TV show, and as the show goes on, the hair gets longer. Jenna Elfman always seems to start with short hair, grow it out, then return to short hair.

Posted By: fatmoogas
Date Posted: March 17 2008 at 8:01pm

She definitely looked wackier with the wild hedge-row of hair.

Posted By: HAWG
Date Posted: March 17 2008 at 9:19pm

This isn't bad; never been a real fan of hair in the eyes. My favorite look on her is still the first season of Dharma and Greg.

-------------
HAWG

Posted By: Mike46019
Date Posted: March 18 2008 at 10:56am

Oh well. As Kramer put it enjoy while you can. I guess we have to see about Berry if she is next to go short.

-------------
Few men are killed by the bayonet;many are scared by it.Bayonets should be fixed when the fire fight starts.General George Patton Jr.,War As I Knew It,1947.

Posted By: Bob S
Date Posted: March 18 2008 at 3:50pm

Looks like Jenna's clock has struck midnight. Not too bad, but not as cute as her Dharma pixie, and definitely not as ravishing as her wavy tresses. A s Mike often says, "Oh well!" (lol) Bob

Posted By: fatmoogas
Date Posted: March 18 2008 at 3:54pm

She seems a spunky, quirky, kind of gal; and I always thought the wild and romantic curls didn't seem to be a reflection of who she was.

Posted By: Kramer
Date Posted: March 20 2008 at 11:25pm

She sure seems to be out in public more now. Where's the baby?

http://img185.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jennaelfmanbikiniuhq99hx1.jpg">

http://img247.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jennaelfmanbikiniuhq98bu2.jpg">

http://img187.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jennaelfmanbikiniuhq97tz3.jpg">

http://img185.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jennaelfmanbikiniuhq96qb7.jpg">

http://img185.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jennaelfmanbikiniuhq95kl1.jpg">

http://img187.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jennaelfmanbikiniuhq94qd1.jpg">

http://img185.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jennaelfmanbikiniuhq93ez6.jpg">

http://img187.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jennaelfmanbikiniuhq92ft7.jpg">

Posted By: Rowlingfan
Date Posted: March 21 2008 at 1:07pm

Your new word for short hair is "matronly"? Major rolleyes. She looks better with the short hair. And no, she doesn't have to have a baby to cut her hair, and once that hair is cut she CERTAINLY doesn't have to carry that baby with her everywhere she goes. Let's have a jump into the present-day, okay?

Posted By: Kramer
Date Posted: March 21 2008 at 11:56pm

I didn't want to answer your terse remarks on Good Friday, but that ended 43 minutes ago where I live, so....

Bottom line: If you can say "She looks better with short hair" as if that's the definitive answer for everyone and there is no argument or room for discussion, then I can say her hair now looks more matronly. It's that simple. I said it today, which, to me, is present day. We have opinions. You have yours. I disagree. See? We all win. My question about her baby was CERTAINLY a connection between her being out on the town (as a new mother) and not having a baby along for the ride and had nothing to do with her hair or her baby's hair for that matter. Speaking of "major rolleyes": "Rowlingfan?" What are you, like 12? Feel free to hit and run any time, but expect to get it in return from me. That will probably disappoint several of the regulars around here, who will no doubt take your side. But I'm cool with that. Hal, fatmoo, ssjock, you're on.

Posted By: Kramer
Date Posted: March 21 2008 at 11:56pm

Oh yeah, Happy Easter.

Posted By: ssjockey
Date Posted: March 22 2008 at 12:45am

Kramer, Kramer, Kramer...where to begin...since you did ask...

First off, I didn't know you were the Jenna Elfman haircut authority. If you look at Jenna Elfman over the years, you would have seen that her hair has been getting shorter and shorter over the past six months. There was no mommy chop. She GRADUALLY went shorter.

Her signature style, like it or not, is short hair. During her time on "Dharma and Greg" she started out with the short hairstyle most (read not all) people loved on her. She grew it out, only to cut it back short, all while she was on the show. She grew her hair out again, experimented with different styles, you know (or maybe you don't) changed her hair to suit HER mood, not anyone else's.

What annoys me the most, is you assume her, and most celebrity women, cut their hair because they are compelled to, not because they want to. At least that is how most of your posts "lamenting" the loss of long hair come across.

Do you think it is some defect of character if a woman wants a different look that doesn't fit in with your vision of what women should look like? I will believe Jenna Elfman cut her hair BECAUSE SHE WANTED TO, not because she had a baby. Also, just maybe, she could possibly look good with short hair. I find that most women look good with long or short hair, as long as it is a good style and in good condition.

As for Rowlingfan, I myself have read all seven books and I'm 45. Just hope Rowlingfan doesn't hit you with the Bat Bogey Hex! Lighten up Kramer, and try, just once, to see the other side of the arguement.

Oh yes, Happy Easter

Kramer wrote:

I didn't want to answer your terse remarks on Good Friday, but that ended 43 minutes ago where I live, so....

Posted By: fatmoogas
Date Posted: March 22 2008 at 3:37am

I think Kramer's reply was balanced and reasonable until the part beginning: "Speaking of major roll eyes..." until the end. This reminded me of an earlier statement of Bob's concerning Kramer: "He (Kramer) has a petulant streak about a mile wide."

Posted By: Ally<3
Date Posted: March 22 2008 at 4:44am

What a ridiculous post. You know of not a reason she cut her hair, nor why she had it long in the first place. Moral of the story? Don't act like you do.

Love the long curls, the short cut has it's charms aswell. Thanks for reminding me she existed.

-------------

Posted By: Kramer
Date Posted: March 22 2008 at 9:50am

Originally posted by ssjockey

Kramer's Response:

You guys are great. You always come through. LOL.

OK, ss, you just know I can't let you have the last word... yet. How can I be the Jenna Elfman hair authority when that title belongs to you, right? "Signature style?" Give me a break. Alanis Morrisette had a signature style and then hacked it off. Katie Couric had super short hair for years and then grew it out. Jenna Elfman had short hair when she was on the show and then grew it out. It's like you're telling me that "once a shorthaired gal, always a shorthaired gal" is a hard and fast rule. The next thing you'll be saying is that someone who just had a baby can cut her hair and look matronly.

You're doing precisely what the previous writer did: Telling me what I think. Where did I say I knew why Darma -- or anyone else for that matter -- got a haircut? If I say she had long hair before the baby and short hair after the baby, am I stating absolutely that she got her hair cut because she had a baby? No way. I'm making the connection because it was easy to do. Very easy. And apparently some other people on here tend to agree with me.

As far as Jenna's hair getting shorter and shorter prior to childbirth, where is your proof? I saw her pregnant and with long hair just prior to the birth. I did my research and I posted the photos. Come on, Bubba, she had a lot of hair cut off. Obviously. She's very pretty and looks good with the shorter hair, just not as good as she used to (my opinion). And, like I've said here a hundred times, you know I'll never stop "lamenting" when a longhaired woman cuts her beautiful locks. I like what I like. I want celebrities to suit my mood, not their mood. Don't you? You really have a hard time admitting I'm right, don't you? LOL

By the way, Ally, you mention "ridiculous," I think there is some rule here against ridiculously large avatars.

Some days this is a lot of fun.

Posted By: ssjockey
Date Posted: March 22 2008 at 12:34pm

If you look on wireimage, you will see Jenna Elfman's hair getting shorter over the last 5 to 6 months. If you must have a link, then:

http://www.wireimage.com/SearchResults.aspx?navtyp=SRH&sfld=C&logsrch=1&s=jenna%20elfman - http://www.wireimage.com/SearchResults.aspx?navtyp=SRH&sfld=C&logsrch=1&s=jenna%20elfman

I don't exactly know when she had her baby. I never said before childbirth, I said recently. Like it or not, if you survey average people I would wager they would say Jenna Elfman's signature style is short, just as Alanis Morissette's signature style is long!

Alanis has gone back to her signature style after experimenting with short hair (finding mixed results, some good, some not so good), so I guess you would say "once a long hair girl, always a long hair girl"? Some women loke long hair, and some short, just like us men! As Alanis Morissette grew out her hair, I don't post "lamenting the lack of haircut" posts. But then again, I don't feel compelled to post five times a day, like you Kramer! ;)

Kramer, I'm not telling you what you think. Read what I wrote, I was telling you how I feel your posts come across. I do not pretend to know what goes through your, or anyone else's head. My interpretation of your opinion is that if a women cuts her hair, you think either she is forced to do so, or it is some character flaw. That is how your posts come across TO ME! You have never (although you have so many posts, I could never get through them all) ever had a nice thing to say about any type of haircut. You may say "she looks nice" but it is always (or seemingly so) prefaced with "her long hair was better" or "wish she grew it out to the former length".

Am I wrong? If I am, please accept my apology.

Posted By: Kramer
Date Posted: March 23 2008 at 1:18am

So is it a good thing I post a lot or a bad thing? For the record, your profile shows you post .4 times a day, while I post 1.48 times a day: a whopping one more time per day than you.

It's too bad you don't have more time to post as your opinions are generally interesting and inciteful even though we disagree a lot.

If you paid more attention, you'd discover that most of my posts contain breaking hair news (or stuff I just discovered) and has no opinion one way or another. Examples: Amber Benson, Daisy Fuentes and Milissa Rehberger got bangs. JoJo went shorter and blonder. Sara Rue is back to being a red head. Melora Hardin's hair got longer over the writer's straike. Debbie Mattenopolous and Natasha Richardson have shorter hair. Contessa Brewer and Alex Witt got trims. (All 2008 posts, by the way.)

Sometimes I comment when something I see impresses me: Kate Beckinsale with longer extensions. Allison Stewart from curly to straight. Christina Ricci looks better as her bangs get longer.

Granted, much of the time I'm critical of new looks. Quite frankly, it's because I liked the way they looked before the cut or style change better. Being honest and truthful is the way to go, right? Like the shocking haircuts of former longhairs Alanis Morrissette, Ann Curry, Rhona Mitra and Rebecca Gayheart. The much shorter dos of Selma Blair, Gina Tognoni, Ashley Massaro, Laura Leighton, Rachel McAdams, Alexis Glick, Barbara Bermudo and, yes, Jenna Elfman. Or color changes like those of Julianne Moore, Ashlee Simpson and Nelly Furtado.

And sometimes -- perhaps more often than most remember -- I say nice things about hair changes, including celebs with shorter hair (Rebecca Jarvis, Alizee, Rihanna), those who have cut their bangs (Kate Hudson, Maria Sharapova, Rachel Bilson) and those who have had cuts or trims and still look great (Demi Moore and, most recently, Gwyneth Paltrow). And that's just in the last few months.

I also make time to post photos of women with long gorgeous hair -- because I appreciate them more than anyone else.

How's that for a report card? I accept your apology.

Posted By: Hal
Date Posted: March 23 2008 at 10:36am

Kramer: " like I've said here a hundred times, you know I'll never stop "lamenting" when a longhaired woman cuts her http://talk.hairboutique.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=59736&PN=2 -

Then why don't you just post about how you sit in you room and cry rather then degrading any female who cuts her hair! Yes DEGRADE - you use the terms matronly or soccer mom regularly and often to put a negative spin on females who cut their hair. Why don�t you just put out a generic post, under a new name Kramer/Bob and say - whining again, same as always - pissed that the vast right wing Locks of Love hair haters won again. Damn their souls! That�s pretty much what I see in nearly all of your post... wah wah wah....

Posted By: Kramer
Date Posted: March 23 2008 at 10:45pm

Wow, what a class act. Too much candy today? You obviously haven't been paying attention.

Not to pick apart your post, but I reckon I have never used the term "soccer mom" in my life, much less here, and I've used the term "matronly" in exactly one strand: this one.

I stand by my own report card filed just before your personal attack.

Posted By: fatmoogas
Date Posted: March 25 2008 at 12:56pm

Kramer, as far as I know, there is no rule about avatars here. Indeed, I often wondered why you don't have one yourself! In any case Ally's is certainly not ridiculously large. It is best to get our information right about these things. Personally, I like Ally's avatar.

Posted By: Kramer
Date Posted: March 25 2008 at 9:28pm

You would be mistaken. Dave (is he still the moderator here?) brought it to my attention once. Since you asked, according to the guidelines (see link on the home page):

Signatures

� Signatures may be no longer than 4 lines

� Signatures may contain 1 image (max. 250 x 100pixels).

� Signatures may contain a link to your http://talk.hairboutique.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=31710&FID=2&PR=3# - - personal � Signatures are expected to follow the same guidelines as posts.

If any visitor is discovered to be deliberately breaking any of the rules listed above you may have your account deleted immediately. There will be no advance warnings given!

Look, I was just picking on Ally because she was picking on me. I don't care one way or the other about her avatar. The fact is her former photo (Paris Hilton, if I recall correctly) and those prior were a lot bigger than the one she's showing now.

Here's an example of 150 X 225, which would be slightly larger than the 250 x 100:

This one (185 x 195) is pretty close:

This one, too, is almost dead on (200 x 167):

This lovely photo is even a bit larger at 186 x 250, although to me it's just right:

By the way, here's an example of 225 x 223:

Class dismissed.

Posted By: Ally<3
Date Posted: March 26 2008 at 4:10am

Oh no Kramer the signature policeman is here to arrest me!

The signature has a scroll bar so you can only see that much of it anyway. And I mean really, who gives a s***?

Get a life.

-------------

Posted By: Kramer
Date Posted: March 26 2008 at 6:59am

Another sterling contribution. I so love it when girls swear. You're such a bad ass. Why did you choose to ignore a key paragraph of my entry:

Posted By: Ally<3
Date Posted: March 26 2008 at 7:10am

No, Kramer, you're such a bad ass wasting so much energy talking about some celebrity's hair style. Woo, livin' on the edge right there.

If you don't care why'd you say anything? You're clearly just trying to pick a fight because you have nothing better to do.

Oh, and it wasn't just a paragraph of yours I ignored. *whip noise* :D

-------------

Posted By: conrad
Date Posted: March 26 2008 at 8:48am

Am i going to have to get a switch after both of you!

Posted By: Hal
Date Posted: March 26 2008 at 9:20am

Ally<3 - Change your sig pic to one with great long hair and I'm sure Kramer will wave the rules for you....

Posted By: trekgod
Date Posted: March 26 2008 at 9:33am

This is just plain wrong. Can everyone please stop picking on Kramer for his opinions, even if they are brash? It's easy to disagree with opinions. Why keep provoking him? It will only draw out more opinions the rest of the 'mob' disagrees with.

Posted By: JerkyFlea
Date Posted: March 26 2008 at 10:14am

OK, to summarize here:

- Kramer liked Jenna's hair long and hates that she cut it shorter. In other stunning news, the sun came up today.

- Hal and ssjockey have no problem with it being shorter and lament Kramer's lamentations on the cut. Word of advice to Hal and ss: Kramer and others like long hair. Other posters like short hair. Sure it's tiresome, but after all these years, I don't see it changing. If you want a new windmill to tilt at, why not go back to picking on Fatmoogas for posting on every thread? At least that dead horse hasn't been beaten for a while. Wink

- Ally gets caught in the cross-fire and her signature pic is way too big (sorry, but it really is. Have come close to PM'ing you a couple of times about that myself).

- Bob is the picture of moderation in his one comment on the subject

So, enough of all that crap. Back to the subject at hand, Jenna's short cut. Personally, not a big fan of it since it just looks hacked more than cut. She has really thick, naturally curly hair, so a shattered bob like this that is then straightened just doesn't quite work with her hair texture. Ironically, this was the same problem with virutally the same cut back in 2001 (search Getty Images to see what I mean) just before she started growing it back out.

At the risk of provoking the natives, I also like her hair long, though the right short cut - e.g. the first season of Dharma&Greg - works well too. So, short can work on her, but this ain't it. I prefer something closer to any of the pics you'd find on www.jennaelfman.com...except for the short pics in the recent news. :)

My guess is that since it's been pretty long for, believe it or not, the past five years, she decided to cut it again. Seems to be her cycle. I'd expect her to keep it for maybe the next year and then start growing it out a bit again. And remember, you read it here first.

As usual,
JF

-------------
3 pm is simultaneously too late and too early to start anything.

Posted By: ssjockey
Date Posted: March 26 2008 at 10:50am

Hey JF, nice to see you hop off of the cat and drop in for a post!

And Kramer INVITED me into this maelstrom! I felt it would be rude to ignore his invitation!

Posted By: fatmoogas
Date Posted: March 26 2008 at 12:33pm

Does Jerky Flea ALWAYS have to come out of the woodwork to protect his beloved Kramer? As Ally says, no one cares if her avatar is a little too big: there is obviously no attempt at abuse intended. I'm sure he'd stay silent if anyone attacked me either justifiably or unjustifiably. The truth is that Jerky Flea still hasn't gotten over the fact that this is no longer HIS forum. Every post he makes, he usually refers to the fact that he's been here so long but is still a junior member (blah, blah, blah...ain't that a shame). It seems that he has decided to go off to his tent and sulk and, in his infinite wisdom, has left Kramer amongst us to play his part.

Posted By: JerkyFlea
Date Posted: March 26 2008 at 12:54pm

fatmoogas wrote:

Does Jerky Flea ALWAYS have to come out of the woodwork to protect his beloved Kramer? As Ally says, no one cares if her avatar is a little too big: there is obviously no attempt at abuse intended. I'm sure he'd stay silent if anyone attacked me either justifiably or unjustifiably. The truth is that Jerky Flea still hasn't gotten over the fact that this is no longer HIS forum. Every post he makes, he usually refers to the fact that he's been here so long but is still a junior member (blah, blah, blah...ain't that a shame). It seems that he has decided to go off to his tent and sulk and, in his infinite wisdom, has left Kramer amongst us to play his part.

Gosh, make one little dig at a person... Smile

Fatmoo, I haven't written a new column for this site since January of 2001. Which, doing some quick math, is still four years before you graced us with your presence. If I had any sort of lingering resentment of this not being MY forum (which it never was in the first place), what a sad, pathetic, little man I'd be. Smile

If you are bored and have the time, you could dig through all my old posts and see that the only time I temporarily borrow the moderator hat from Dave and Karen is to try to head off one if the bi-annual swirls on short hair vs. long hair or Locks of Love or some other unwinnable and endless argument.

Further, while you are excavating my previous missives on this board, you'll see that I've had plenty of run-ins with Gord (aka Kramer) myself over the years. In fact, I'm sure Kramer himself as well as folks on here that pre-date you would find it pretty funny that you regard Kramer as my proxy on the forum. But, you're certainly entitled to your opinion.

So, with that, I'll exit this discussion and head back to the FleaCave under stately FleaManor (I've upgraded from the tent) and wait to comment on another hair related topic when one comes up. Smile

As usual,
JF

P.S. And, for what it's worth, if giant signature pictures weren't annoying and an issue previously on this forum, why would there be a rule against it? Wink

-------------
3 pm is simultaneously too late and too early to start anything.

Posted By: natasha
Date Posted: March 26 2008 at 1:10pm

Just for the record: I'm pissed each and every time I have to scroll past one of those oversized signatures. In my browser (Safari) the scrolling box around those signatures captures my scroll wheel. So each time I try to scroll down a thread, I end up scrolling inside the signature box instead.

That is totally annoying. Plus, I absolutely don't see the point in using photo signatures that are so huge you can't even see them without scrolling. Sorry, but that is plain stupid.

It's too bad that the software this message board is running on does not offer an option to hide/ignore/disable other people's avatars and signatures if you don't want to see them. Most message boards have such an option.

Posted By: Ally<3
Date Posted: March 26 2008 at 6:34pm

I downsized the picture so those people can stop crying about how my signature is ruining their foruming life. Wha wha wha.

LOL @ Hal, and I heart you fatmoogas.

-------------

Posted By: Kramer
Date Posted: March 26 2008 at 7:35pm

Wow, what a busy day. I'm too tired after a way-too-long day at work to post some sort of response, but I reserve the right to do just to stir the pot, if nothing else. Thanks for a lot of laughs.

To be continued...

Posted By: Hal
Date Posted: March 27 2008 at 9:33am

I think anyone who reads my posts know 2 things..... I can't spell and have no problem with Bob or Kramers pref. for long hair. It�s the way they voice their dislike and only when I can no longer stomach their lack of understanding of why this or that woman cut her hair, she was forced, pushed leaned on..ect. It�s as ridiculous as me not being able to figure out why once this Pob crazy is over why so many women are growing out their hair! BECAUSE THEY WANT TOOO!!!!!!!!

The other thing that gets under my skin is when THEY imply or say a woman is no longer beautiful because her hair is gone. Say you don't like it, that�s fine but to imply, regularly, that someone is no longer attractive because her hair is shorter...come on, that�s just not nice!

Posted By: ssjockey
Date Posted: March 27 2008 at 3:05pm

That's what I am also saying, although with not as large a font!

Posted By: Ally<3
Date Posted: March 28 2008 at 5:38am

ssjockey wrote:

That's what I am also saying, although with not as large a font!

LOL

-------------

Posted By: Mike46019
Date Posted: March 31 2008 at 1:42am

Ok I agree they aren't as nice in mine eyes with the shorter do. I just don't know why. I just like it longer. But there is point where it doesn't look at all.

-------------
Few men are killed by the bayonet;many are scared by it.Bayonets should be fixed when the fire fight starts.General George Patton Jr.,War As I Knew It,1947.

Posted By: HAWG
Date Posted: March 09 2009 at 7:57pm

Curly and still short, looking good.

-------------
HAWG

Posted By: Curlyfan
Date Posted: March 10 2009 at 9:52am

Hmmm. I love short and I love curly, but I don't quite love this. Not bad, but not her best.

-------------
Your hair is your best accessory; wear it with STYLE!

Posted By: HAWG
Date Posted: March 10 2009 at 7:55pm

It is much better than a year ago though.

-------------
HAWG

Posted By: fatmoogas
Date Posted: March 11 2009 at 2:09am

Messy.

Posted By: Bob S
Date Posted: March 11 2009 at 2:45pm

I always thought that Jenna was cute with her pixie during the "Dharma" days; then years later I was stunned to see her transformed into a siren with tresses. Now, Jenna's short hair looks stiff yet unkempt. This was a very bad decision, IMO. Bob

Print Page | Close Window