QuoteReplyTopic: Catherine Zeta-Jones banged! Posted: October 06 2003 at 8:07am
Catherine is in the same boat Jane Seymour was. When a part calls for short hair,she will be allowed to wear a wig,just like Jane was. She does have very beautiful hair and I would hate to see her cut it. Speaking of Jane,I think we do need an actress with waist length hair again. Catherine would be perfect for that position!
Sorry Dave for some reason Gord just gets me going on my soap box. I guess it is from all the times he used to slam almost every thing I said. Gord brought up a good point and a sexy pic of Catherine too.
My ansewer was no she did not need them but looks just as sexy with them.
DaveDecker
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Senior Moderator
Joined: November 28 2000
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3247
Nah, my dream world would involve very short-haired, slightly androgynous women in business suits, actually. I'm the one who's into bursting gender roles wide open, remember? For real, though, I've actually been reading up about fashion for once, so I've read about how some of the major design houses were showing '20s-inspired clothing. And then there were some nice flapper-like dresses in the Emmys, too. . . Hopefully that's a good sign that some of the '20s thing will actually trickle down into the closets of the average American woman. *hopes, anyway* That was a cool era. . . maybe the first time American women on a large scale ever tried to revolt against society's expectations of femininity :-) .
I like long-haired women in all their guises, including in business suits, which could be seen as being contrary to the expected short-haired-woman-in-a-business-suit look in the workplace.
When you mentioned '20s inspired styles I presumed you were talking about the most recent decades of the '20s, that being the 1920s (as opposed to the 1820s or 1720s)... though "recent" and "1920s" are hardly congruous.
DaveDecker
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Senior Moderator
Joined: November 28 2000
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3247
Well I guess she thought she did or she would not have them right now! When it comes down to it all its up to her how to wear her hair, and if she wants hair down to her ankels and short bangs thats her right as a U.S. citizen to wear her hair as she feels fit, same goes the other way, if she chooses to chop her famous long sexy mane into a nice short mane and short bangs or no bangs that is her deciesion and no one else. Unless of course she is asked to cut it for a movie but even then she can decline to take the job or demand to wear a wig like she did in Chicago.I think she is pretty and has nice long hair, but would look just as sexy with short hair. You never know unless you try.
Though I do agree with you on your "it's her decision" ramble, it took you awhile to get around to answering Gord's simple question (what was the point of your diatribe in the context of the subject?)
She tried, and now we know -- she looks better without the bangs. Though I think some suspected as much before the bangs appeared.
Well I guess she thought she did or she would not have them right now! When it comes down to it all its up to her how to wear her hair, and if she wants hair down to her ankels and short bangs thats her right as a U.S. citizen to wear her hair as she feels fit, same goes the other way, if she chooses to chop her famous long sexy mane into a nice short mane and short bangs or no bangs that is her deciesion and no one else. Unless of course she is asked to cut it for a movie but even then she can decline to take the job or demand to wear a wig like she did in Chicago.I think she is pretty and has nice long hair, but would look just as sexy with short hair. You never know unless you try.
Gord
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Senior Member
Joined: December 09 2000
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 1395
Nah, my dream world would involve very short-haired, slightly androgynous women in business suits, actually. I'm the one who's into bursting gender roles wide open, remember? For real, though, I've actually been reading up about fashion for once, so I've read about how some of the major design houses were showing '20s-inspired clothing. And then there were some nice flapper-like dresses in the Emmys, too. . . Hopefully that's a good sign that some of the '20s thing will actually trickle down into the closets of the average American woman. *hopes, anyway* That was a cool era. . . maybe the first time American women on a large scale ever tried to revolt against society's expectations of femininity :-) .
DaveDecker wrote:
Huh? '20s retro? On what planet? Kuronekodreamsphere?
More awesome than a manatee!
Grace912
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Junior Member
Joined: October 02 2003
Status: Offline
Points: 138
The bangs are great; then again, CZJ always has gorgeous hair.
Somehow, I don't see her going very short. Not that it wouldn't look good, but it just doesn't seem very "her." Her personality has always seemed very leonine, for lack of a better term. She's someone who kind of needs long, full, almost manelike hair. The flapper bob looked good on her as Velma Kelly, but in real life I don't think she'd ever be quite comfortable with that.
Monica: Isn't there any way that you could look at this as flattering? I mean, she's doing this to be more like you. Rachel: Well, then, couldn't she have just copied my haircut?
Jf, you sound a little peved at the thought of CZJ going short. She may just look even better with short hair then she does with long hair. I do agree with you on that she won't go short because of a kid. As you said she will just put it in a tail. Some how I think Catherine would hate short hair and if she ever did cut it she would hate it and start growing it out right away and wear extensions till its long again. Just my 2 cents.
Sorry for jumping in so late on this one. To agree with Mr. Decker, CZJ didn't need bangs. Looked fantastic without them. However, if she is going to cut them, they shouldn't be long bangs, since those just don't flatter roundish faces like the lovely Catherines. Should be cut to the top of her eyebrows. Would balance her face better and highlight her eyes. I'll bet this will be one of the few times you see them worn as bangs. Look for them to be swept back or styled to either side of her forehead when she wears her traditional center-parted style.
And she ain't going shorter because of the kid. Didn't the first time and won't this time. If she's like most moms I know who have long hair and like it, they simply throw it back in a ponytail for convenience and so little hands can't grab it.
JF
3 pm is simultaneously too late and too early to start anything.
Since no one answered my question, I had to roll up my sleeves and do a little investigative work. Much to my surprise the elderly gentleman pictured with Catherine Zeta Jones is none other than old man Douglas, who soon thereafter could be heard uttering "you kids get off my lawn" while waving his cane in the air.
DaveDecker
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Senior Moderator
Joined: November 28 2000
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3247
As everyone else said she does look younger with the bangs. Its a pleasent change, and she looks awesom with the bangs. I to would love to see her cut her hair for real like she had it in Chicago, she would look so darn hot.
loveshorthair
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Super Elite Member
Joined: August 09 2001
Status: Offline
Points: 3965
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Topic Options
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Kuroneko wrote:
