Scarlett Johansson

Please, that's enough bickering about nothing.  I see no reason why people can't post multiple times within a given thread, so long as they offer some additional thoughts, insight, or info.

makeitshort wrote: Kramer wrote: makeitshort wrote: Kramer, Let's see.  You've posted three times in a thread about a woman you find unattractive, unsexy, & overrated with awful hair. Little too much time on your hands? You counted my posts? Who really has too much time on his/her hands? (Note to Makeitshort: This is No. 4. Use your fingers or have someone show you how to use a calculator if it helps. Note also that only two of the four were on the abovementioned subject of this thread. But you probably already noticed.) Ummm, OK Kramer (Gord???), I ain't had much learnin' so I does hav lot of spare time.  Thank you kindly fur the sugestin, but if you get past five, I have to start usin my toes.  If you happens to pass 9, I'll get lost.  What's a calcelatur? I just find it humorous that you post multiple times in a thread about someone you obviously have not interest in, whether or not each post relates to the subject.  You still had to spend time to read the posts & the write out a response.   I don't bother with threads about people I have no interest in.  I follow this thread & read each post because I find Scarlett one of the most gorgeous, sexy women on the planet.  Obvioiusly, you don't. Take care.

I never saw the connection before, but you're right Kramer could very well be Gordo.

Let's review:

-Both rehash threads from months or even years ago.

-Both feel the need to post on just about every thread.

-Kramer became a member about the same time Gordo disappeared.

Makes you think.

makeitshort wrote: Kramer, Let's see.  You've posted three times in a thread about a woman you find unattractive, unsexy, & overrated with awful hair. Little too much time on your hands?

He's trying to catch up to the number of posts Fatmoogas has made! 

I like it when girls swear.

About Scarlett: I think she's extremely overrated. I would not have listed her anywhere in the top 100 in FHM's sexiest 100 in the world poll, much less the winner. I could look at the bottom of the list -- Josie Maran, Naomi Watts (a personal shorter-haired favorite of mine), Heather Graham and Vanessa Marcil -- and place all four ahead of Scarlett. I just don't see what others see in her, obviously.

As for her hair, it often looks "rooty." If you're going to dye your hair, for heaven's sake, color the roots!

http://www.fhmus.com/girls_100_sexiest_2006_14.asp?cnl_id=1& amp; amp;stn_id=72

Hellfrozeover wrote: We also know that some don't consider a woman sexy unless her hair is under a foot long!

Hey HFO...could you resize your avatar?  it's a little big, thanks