QuoteReplyTopic: Jenna Elfman Posted: March 11 2009 at 2:45pm
I always thought that Jenna was cute with her pixie during the "Dharma" days; then years later I was stunned to see her transformed into a siren with tresses. Now, Jenna's short hair looks stiff yet unkempt. This was a very bad decision, IMO. Bob
Edited by Bob S - March 11 2009 at 2:46pm
fatmoogas
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Lifetime Member
Super Member
Joined: March 15 2005
Location: UAE
Status: Offline
Points: 5654
Ok I agree they aren't as nice in mine eyes with the shorter do. I just don't know why. I just like it longer. But there is point where it doesn't look at all.
Few men are killed by the bayonet;many are scared by it.Bayonets should be fixed when the fire fight starts.General George Patton Jr.,War As I Knew It,1947.
Ally<3
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Member
Joined: November 13 2007
Location: here
Status: Offline
Points: 641
I think anyone who reads my posts know 2 things..... I can't spell and have no problem with Bob or Kramers pref. for long hair. It’s the way they voice their dislike and only when I can no longer stomach their lack of understanding of why this or that woman cut her hair, she was forced, pushed leaned on..ect. It’s as ridiculous as me not being able to figure out why once this Pob crazy is over why so many women are growing out their hair!BECAUSE THEY WANT TOOO!!!!!!!!
The other thing that gets under my skin is when THEY imply or say a woman is no longer beautiful because her hair is gone. Say you don't like it, that’s fine but to imply, regularly, that someone is no longer attractive because her hair is shorter...come on, that’s just not nice!
Kramer
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Lifetime Member
Joined: March 21 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 5000
Wow, what a busy day. I'm too tired after a way-too-long day at work to post some sort of response, but I reserve the right to do just to stir the pot, if nothing else. Thanks for a lot of laughs.
To be continued...
Ally<3
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Member
Joined: November 13 2007
Location: here
Status: Offline
Points: 641
Just for the record: I'm pissed each and every time I have to scroll past one of those oversized signatures. In my browser (Safari) the scrolling box around those signatures captures my scroll wheel. So each time I try to scroll down a thread, I end up scrolling inside the signature box instead.
That is totally annoying. Plus, I absolutely don't see the point in using photo signatures that are so huge you can't even see them without scrolling. Sorry, but that is plain stupid.
It's too bad that the software this message board is running on does not offer an option to hide/ignore/disable other people's avatars and signatures if you don't want to see them. Most message boards have such an option.
Does Jerky Flea ALWAYS have to come out of the woodwork to protect his beloved Kramer? As Ally says, no one cares if her avatar is a little too big: there is obviously no attempt at abuse intended. I'm sure he'd stay silent if anyone attacked me either justifiably or unjustifiably. The truth is that Jerky Flea still hasn't gotten over the fact that this is no longer HIS forum. Every post he makes, he usually refers to the fact that he's been here so long but is still a junior member (blah, blah, blah...ain't that a shame). It seems that he has decided to go off to his tent and sulk and, in his infinite wisdom, has left Kramer amongst us to play his part.
Gosh, make one little dig at a person...
Fatmoo, I haven't written a new column for this site since January of 2001. Which, doing some quick math, is still four years before you graced us with your presence. If I had any sort of lingering resentment of this not being MY forum (which it never was in the first place), what a sad, pathetic, little man I'd be.
If you are bored and have the time, you could dig through all my old posts and see that the only time I temporarily borrow the moderator hat from Dave and Karen is to try to head off one if the bi-annual swirls on short hair vs. long hair or Locks of Love or some other unwinnable and endless argument.
Further, while you are excavating my previous missives on this board, you'll see that I've had plenty of run-ins with Gord (aka Kramer) myself over the years. In fact, I'm sure Kramer himself as well as folks on here that pre-date you would find it pretty funny that you regard Kramer as my proxy on the forum. But, you're certainly entitled to your opinion.
So, with that, I'll exit this discussion and head back to the FleaCave under stately FleaManor (I've upgraded from the tent) and wait to comment on another hair related topic when one comes up.
As usual, JF
P.S. And, for what it's worth, if giant signature pictures weren't annoying and an issue previously on this forum, why would there be a rule against it?
Edited by JerkyFlea - March 26 2008 at 1:13pm
3 pm is simultaneously too late and too early to start anything.
fatmoogas
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Lifetime Member
Super Member
Joined: March 15 2005
Location: UAE
Status: Offline
Points: 5654
Does Jerky Flea ALWAYS have to come out of the woodwork to protect his beloved Kramer? As Ally says, no one cares if her avatar is a little too big: there is obviously no attempt at abuse intended. I'm sure he'd stay silent if anyone attacked me either justifiably or unjustifiably. The truth is that Jerky Flea still hasn't gotten over the fact that this is no longer HIS forum. Every post he makes, he usually refers to the fact that he's been here so long but is still a junior member (blah, blah, blah...ain't that a shame). It seems that he has decided to go off to his tent and sulk and, in his infinite wisdom, has left Kramer amongst us to play his part.
ssjockey
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Senior Member
Joined: November 30 2000
Status: Offline
Points: 1946
- Kramer liked Jenna's hair long and hates that she cut it shorter. In other stunning news, the sun came up today.
- Hal and ssjockey have no problem with it being shorter and lament Kramer's lamentations on the cut. Word of advice to Hal and ss: Kramer and others like long hair. Other posters like short hair. Sure it's tiresome, but after all these years, I don't see it changing. If you want a new windmill to tilt at, why not go back to picking on Fatmoogas for posting on every thread? At least that dead horse hasn't been beaten for a while.
- Ally gets caught in the cross-fire and her signature pic is way too big (sorry, but it really is. Have come close to PM'ing you a couple of times about that myself).
- Bob is the picture of moderation in his one comment on the subject
So, enough of all that crap. Back to the subject at hand, Jenna's short cut. Personally, not a big fan of it since it just looks hacked more than cut. She has really thick, naturally curly hair, so a shattered bob like this that is then straightened just doesn't quite work with her hair texture. Ironically, this was the same problem with virutally the same cut back in 2001 (search Getty Images to see what I mean) just before she started growing it back out.
At the risk of provoking the natives, I also like her hair long, though the right short cut - e.g. the first season of Dharma&Greg - works well too. So, short can work on her, but this ain't it. I prefer something closer to any of the pics you'd find on www.jennaelfman.com...except for the short pics in the recent news. :)
My guess is that since it's been pretty long for, believe it or not, the past five years, she decided to cut it again. Seems to be her cycle. I'd expect her to keep it for maybe the next year and then start growing it out a bit again. And remember, you read it here first.
As usual, JF
3 pm is simultaneously too late and too early to start anything.
trekgod
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Newbie
Joined: February 02 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 86
This is just plain wrong. Can everyone please stop picking on Kramer for his opinions, even if they are brash? It's easy to disagree with opinions. Why keep provoking him? It will only draw out more opinions the rest of the 'mob' disagrees with.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Topic Options
Post Options
Thanks(0)
ssjockey wrote:
