Scarlett Johansson

The link works - you just have to manually copy and paste the link
into your browser window, and cut out the garbage (percent signs
and such) that get inserted where the web address has a line break.

Anyway, I saw the Leno appearance. It's a classic asymmetrical cut,
chin length on her right, sloped down to almost shoulder length on
her left, with long sideswept bangs.

I always wonder why women choose this cut. My only theory is that
the client has an argument with her stylist over length, and this is
how they compromise. I don't think it's flattering (especially having
now seen the far more flattering picture of her at the Match Point
premiere) and I hope it's not the start of an asymmetrical trend.

By the way, in this pic and her Leno appearance, her chest appeared
noticably larger. And she just turned 21. Coincidence?

I'm not sure it is cut.  It could be that tuck the hair under trick.  That would explain some of the loose pieces (shorter layers) making it appear like an uneven bob.  I'm just not sure - I wish it was cut into a short bob - I think she would look great.  Here is a link to look for yourself.

http://www.scarlettjohansson.org/gallery/index.php?cat=41

 

Didn't see the show itself, but the pics look like a faux-bob, not a cut. The hair looks rolled under from the side, not curled/blown under. My vote is for just up, not cut. Incidentally, I also hope thats the case. She looks pretty drab here, compared to her usual looks.

I'm almost certain that's tucked under. Been there, done that and looked boring.

Not a cut looking at the link that loveshort&blonde gave us it looks like it's a updo type of thing. You can see it sort of falling in one of the pics. Near the back of her head there is strand that hangs.

This is awful. She has dark brown/red hair now. And is that some sort of nose ring? I thought some magazine just picked her as the sexiest babe around. Not any more, if she ever was in the first place.

http://people.aol.com/people/galleries/0,19884,1057077_3,00. html

ssjockey wrote: I would assume it is a look for some movie she is doing, and anyways, she is what? 20, 21? If you can't experiment with your look when you are young, when can you? Kramer wrote: This is awful. She has dark brown/red hair now. And is that some sort of nose ring? I thought some magazine just picked her as the sexiest babe around. Not any more, if she ever was in the first place. http://people.aol.com/people/galleries/0,19884,1057077_3,00. html

SS, I agree.  Also, it is not styled & she looks like she has no makeup.  Awful picture of a gorgeous, SEXY woman.

As for not being sexy, we do know that some don't consider a woman sexy unless their hair is at least a foot below shoulder-length.

In that People feature, Alannis Morisette looks far worse that Scarlett.

Great suggestion, ssjockey. I was going to say something, but I didn't want to be accused of being the "avitar police." I'm so sensitive.

Lol, good question that.

I'll resize it soon. To be honest, it scared the living s**t out of me when I posted it as I didn't think it was so big.