Brittney...Latest pic

She looks good. For a change.

I like it who knows how long it's going to last LOL.

Natasha,
The point, which was clearly lost on you i guess, was that the other two threads covered two different topics(length/colour).Neither thread had a pic.
When I found the pic this morning, I added it to the relavent posts, as it illustrated both well.
The reason to start the new thread was that, as I said in the subject line, it was the "latest pic". Since both of the other related threads had been up for a few days, and had been  viewed to death by now, I started this other thread because many of us who are at the site daily, do not always feel the need to re-read the same threads day after day. Ergo, the pic would not be seen by as many members. This way, I was just ensuring that those who came daily, and didn't re-read each and every thread that they read the day before(and the day before...), would actually get to see the pic.
Sorry if I wasted what  must be some of your extra-specially important time. Nobody else seemed offended. Or, perhaps you personally pay for the site hosting, or bandwidth.Sorry if I wasted valuable space. Maybe, you are just in charge of monitoring the whole,"brilliant thinking" thing. Quite frankly, I am not sure. I just hope you didn't lose sleep.

eKatherine,
Thank you for your feedback. This will be my last post in defence of my earlier actions(posted a pic more than once...), but I'll try to explain.I now feel like I am actually wasting space(this is a forum for the discussion of celebrity hair, not a chat room).
Every morning when I get to the salon. I ask our receptionist, who has already been to the site, "Any new threads/pics?".At this point,she either says yes, at which point we all gather to take a peek, or she says"nope, same old, same old, /nothing new".
Now I really enjoy reading the opinions of other members, which I do when I am afforded the time to, but if a post has been around for a bit, it's not often that I will re-visit it. I will go once, often twice to see feedback, and thats usually it. I added the pic to the appropriate threads when I found it, but then thought, many people will not see it. Sure many would, but lots would not even open the other Brittney threads at this point, as they were getting a bit old.
I thought, well , for those who won't re-open those threads, I just wanted to draw their attention to what I felt was a relavent, noteworthy pic.
It was not my intention to "bombard the board with similar posts". A sincere apology to anyone who's time I wasted, but I don't feel I did anything that wrong.

and once again, she still looks here.

eKatherine,
Here I am again, despite my promise to let this die. Now , I am of the opinion that we utilize the board in different ways. When you  say "i should ask" if there are "any new posts to our threads" instead  of "are there new threads/pics", I think the point becomes clear. I go to this site to see if there are any cool (or not...), new  developments in the world of celebrity hair. I am interested first and foremost in trends, and recent developments in celebrity hair. Second to that, I am interested in the opinions of other members. Thirdly, I would check to see if "my/our posts" got any response.The third, is not a huge issue for me. I don't care if there are or not. I'm not seeking validation, although I hope occasionally to inspire some discussion.
I understand how the board works. I know what "the little envelope to the left of the thread" means. Sometimes people zip in, and zip out, on sites like this. I know I do, as do many people I know .
My "latest pic" thread was , I guess, for members like me. People who sometimes have only a momemt or two to check in to see the latest.I love when I have nothing better to do than just cruise leisurely through the site, but sometimes, I just care to see whats new.That being said, thank you agin for your input. I would welcome further discussion if you like, but feel it would be better servrd if done through e--mail....
feel free to repond to  rardman@hotmail.com
All the best.
P.S. So, ster all this, what do you think of her hair?...lol

I think eKatherine's hair is gorgeous. No need to go throwing around personal insults just because you disagree with her point of view.

I'm not sure that calling women "cows" is as much a personal insult as a reflection of the mind of the would-be insulter. In any case, it would not do for such a person to take instruction on how the board operates from a lowly female, especially one with hair so much better than his.

Johnny,
This appears to way out of hand. I in no way would insult a fellow member's hair(regardless of what I thought of it), or insult them on any level in a public forum. Although I suppose, this was done "in my defense", I would ask that you don't do it again, especially where it has to do with me or my postings.
Thank you for your support, but no more insults...k?

Katherine,
I apologize for you having to be insulted publiclly like that. I feel it was uncalled for.

Dave Decker,
I agree with warning Johnny not to insult people here. What he did was inappropriate. However, did you read the posts that preceeded his.Granted, he was a bit more up front with his insults, but can you say the tone of Natasha's little post wasn't a tad insulting to me? Guess thats allright though? No warning for her?
So I committed what has turned out to be a huge cardinal sin(multiple posting!!!), which incidentlly I have seen here before to far less outcry. I will not do it again. There was a much nicer way for the members who seem to know best, to convey their ideas and sentiments.

Anyway ,
Once Again I apologize, and Good Day To All

Hi Hi:

I really like the color and style.  I think she would look better with bangs.

Susan