None of them IMO. No offence but posts saying that random celebs need to chop off their hair suck a little bit. It's their choice at the end of the day. Noone needs a cut.
AngelDream
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Junior Member
Joined: July 25 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 201
Few men are killed by the bayonet;many are scared by it.Bayonets should be fixed when the fire fight starts.General George Patton Jr.,War As I Knew It,1947.
Kiran Chetry (I'm guessing she'll get some votes):
Alysin Camerota (looks best in bangs):
Page Hopkins:
Laurie Dhue (not Duhe):
Megyn Kendall (apparently not Megan):
Personally, I'm not going to vote for any of them to get a haircut. Juliet and Page have more of a layered look these days and Kiran's hair is somewhat longer. The one I struggle with is E.D. Hill. For the life of me, I don't understand why Fox picked her as the female face of their morning show. The photo above may be the best one I've ever seen of her. Most days it seems like she struggles with a hairstyle.
If you can't see the photos in this box, you can click and see them here:
E.D. Hill looks a bit more like Ed Hill.. The rest are okay but MegYn might have had a bit of a nosejob accident. All have the same basic haircut styled differently..like fembots.
I say E.D. Hill needs to do something way more than the others on the list. Her hair never looks good and it seems like she doesn't care. This is surprising for someone who anchors a morning news program on a major network. A while back, she cut her hair a bit shorter and it appeared she was going for an image change. Unfortunately, it was short-lived.
trophywife
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Junior Member
Joined: November 28 2005
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 318
The one with the dark hair looks worst in the photos posted above, but it's difficult to tell from just the one frieze-frame. I'm not such a fan of newsreader hair on the whole, it's not really very hip, is it?
DaveDecker
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Senior Moderator
Joined: November 28 2000
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3247
None of them IMO. No offence but posts saying that
random celebs need to chop off their hair suck a little bit. It's their
choice at the end of the day. Noone needs a cut.
I agree with Hellfrozeover.
Since you seem to be a fervid friend of fox, I might have guessed you'd
be more "fair and balanced." (But of course, Fox's perspective
isn't, so I'm really not surprised). If your poll were actually
more "fair and balanced," you'd at least have a choice of "none," and
also choices for talking heads to wear their hair longer.
[Edited to self-moderate]
Edited by DaveDecker
Observer
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Newbie
Joined: December 15 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3
The question is which could use a "good" cut, not a major cut or a short cut, but a good cut. Judging by the photos, I'd say several have room for improvement or change, if only so they don't look so similar. Laurie Dhue looks fabulous, though.
On a side note, I watch CNN myself (probably just out of habit), but I'm always a bit amused by the Fox bashers. What Fox bashers don't seem to understand is that the reason Fox News is such a contrast to the others is because the others lean left. All news organizations & news presenters have bias. They are human. Just keep it in perspective & try to filter thru the B.S. as best you can.
Hairnut2
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Newbie
Joined: December 14 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 10
Fox has indeed perfected cloning, but at least this uni-style is an improvement upon the old super short crop to bob look EVERY female anchor in the country had a few years ago.
To answer you question, none of the above *need* a cut; in fact, I think they all would ascend into the stratosphere with 6-18" extra length. THEN, they would truly stand out! Bob
The question is which could use a "good" cut, not a major cut or a
short cut, but a good cut. Judging by the photos, I'd say several have
room for improvement or change, if only so they don't look so
similar. Laurie Dhue looks fabulous, though.
In this context, if one defines "good" as "performed with precision" then it may be that they all have "good" cuts.
But I sense from what both you (and Rod, and possibly the hairnut2) write, you guys want to see variety. Why was it so difficult to use that word in the first place?
News departments budgets may not allow room for more than 1
stylist. Maybe you'll consider seeking out other news outlets for
different stylists' efforts (and other news and political POV's)?
[QUOTE=Observer]
News departments budgets may not allow room for more than 1
stylist. Maybe you'll consider seeking out other news outlets for
different stylists' efforts (and other news and political POV's)?
HaaaHAaaaa!
That made my day. Like they have no money left for stylists. Why,
because their paying so much for researchers and fact checkers?
HahaHAaaaaaa!
"It has to start somewhere. It has to start some time. What better place than here. What better time than now." - Zack De La Rocha
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Topic Options
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Hellfrozeover wrote:
Bob