QuoteReplyTopic: The Case for JLo Posted: March 26 2002 at 8:42pm
Always being in the minority, I`ll take to defending JLo`s 60`s inspired `do. I think most of us would agree the JLo`s hair is more often than not undernoticed -- based on other ultra-feminine aspects of her body (no need to spell "it" out). But why should we `rear` our ugly heads at the gorgeous Barbiesque hair bonanza that she displayed? Yes, maybe it was a tad to high, and yes, maybe it was a tad to wide, but let`s face it, most of us girls would give our eye teeth for hair like that (even if it was supplanted with a now ubiquitous fall). ;-)
Gord
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Senior Member
Joined: December 09 2000
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 1395
I have no problem with the way Jenny`s (I refuse to say J-Lo) hair looked on Oscar night -- or most nights, except when she had that short curly wig-like thing on her head. It made me think se was going for a simpler, classier look than usual -- much the way Britney Spears did at the Grammy`s.
waggingtail
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Newbie
Joined: January 20 2002
Status: Offline
Points: 15
I have no problem with the way Jenny's (I refuse to say J-Lo) hair looked on Oscar night -- or most nights, except when she had that short curly wig-like thing on her head. It made me think se was going for a simpler, classier look than usual -- much the way Britney Spears did at the Grammy's.
Yeah, except the difference is that Britney`s hair looked good!! :)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum