Nah, my dream world would involve very short-haired, slightly androgynous women in business suits, actually. I'm the one who's into bursting gender roles wide open, remember? For real, though, I've actually been reading up about fashion for once, so I've read about how some of the major design houses were showing '20s-inspired clothing. And then there were some nice flapper-like dresses in the Emmys, too. . . Hopefully that's a good sign that some of the '20s thing will actually trickle down into the closets of the average American woman. *hopes, anyway* That was a cool era. . . maybe the first time American women on a large scale ever tried to revolt against society's expectations of femininity :-) .
DaveDecker wrote:
Huh? '20s retro? On what planet? Kuronekodreamsphere?
More awesome than a manatee!
princessmonica
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Member
Joined: February 26 2003
Status: Offline
Points: 653
Well I guess she thought she did or she would not have them right now! When it comes down to it all its up to her how to wear her hair, and if she wants hair down to her ankels and short bangs thats her right as a U.S. citizen to wear her hair as she feels fit, same goes the other way, if she chooses to chop her famous long sexy mane into a nice short mane and short bangs or no bangs that is her deciesion and no one else. Unless of course she is asked to cut it for a movie but even then she can decline to take the job or demand to wear a wig like she did in Chicago.I think she is pretty and has nice long hair, but would look just as sexy with short hair. You never know unless you try.
DaveDecker
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Senior Moderator
Joined: November 28 2000
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3247
Well I guess she thought she did or she would not have them right now! When it comes down to it all its up to her how to wear her hair, and if she wants hair down to her ankels and short bangs thats her right as a U.S. citizen to wear her hair as she feels fit, same goes the other way, if she chooses to chop her famous long sexy mane into a nice short mane and short bangs or no bangs that is her deciesion and no one else. Unless of course she is asked to cut it for a movie but even then she can decline to take the job or demand to wear a wig like she did in Chicago.I think she is pretty and has nice long hair, but would look just as sexy with short hair. You never know unless you try.
Though I do agree with you on your "it's her decision" ramble, it took you awhile to get around to answering Gord's simple question (what was the point of your diatribe in the context of the subject?)
She tried, and now we know -- she looks better without the bangs. Though I think some suspected as much before the bangs appeared.
DaveDecker
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Senior Moderator
Joined: November 28 2000
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3247
Nah, my dream world would involve very short-haired, slightly androgynous women in business suits, actually. I'm the one who's into bursting gender roles wide open, remember? For real, though, I've actually been reading up about fashion for once, so I've read about how some of the major design houses were showing '20s-inspired clothing. And then there were some nice flapper-like dresses in the Emmys, too. . . Hopefully that's a good sign that some of the '20s thing will actually trickle down into the closets of the average American woman. *hopes, anyway* That was a cool era. . . maybe the first time American women on a large scale ever tried to revolt against society's expectations of femininity :-) .
I like long-haired women in all their guises, including in business suits, which could be seen as being contrary to the expected short-haired-woman-in-a-business-suit look in the workplace.
When you mentioned '20s inspired styles I presumed you were talking about the most recent decades of the '20s, that being the 1920s (as opposed to the 1820s or 1720s)... though "recent" and "1920s" are hardly congruous.
Sorry Dave for some reason Gord just gets me going on my soap box. I guess it is from all the times he used to slam almost every thing I said. Gord brought up a good point and a sexy pic of Catherine too.
My ansewer was no she did not need them but looks just as sexy with them.
Gord
Members Profile
Send Private Message
Find Members Posts
Add to Buddy List
Senior Member
Joined: December 09 2000
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 1395
Catherine is in the same boat Jane Seymour was. When a part calls for short hair,she will be allowed to wear a wig,just like Jane was. She does have very beautiful hair and I would hate to see her cut it. Speaking of Jane,I think we do need an actress with waist length hair again. Catherine would be perfect for that position!
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Topic Options
Post Options
Thanks(0)
DaveDecker wrote:
